O_Lineman17's forum posts

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts

As of right now? Woudl have to be my computer. Dropped 2 grand on this puppy and lvin every bit of it.

Of all time? my NES. Coudln't live without it. Too many memories

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts

[QUOTE="O_Lineman17"]Personally, I think this is going to be a great game. We've seen(so far) Molyneux delivering on his promises in the vids for this game. Don't so quick to jump on the hate train just because the first game didn't deliver al the promised features. Some of you are saying "look past the fanboyism", well, I'm asking you the same thing. The first game was a very solid RPG. If you look past what was promised, ignore all that, and play as if you just picked up the game as a regular person, the game is actually quite fun. People just got too caught up in the hype and formed a bias when the game underperformed what was promised. Sure it was a dissapointment, but the game was good. Now we know molyneux is delivering on his statements, why can't people think this game will be good? Everyone seems to think Killzone 2 will be amazing because of it's graphics. Really. That's just about allw e have to base it on, because for all we know the gameplay could turn out like the first, which was broken. Now, look at Fable. We have lots of gameplay footage showing off many features, yet many still say it will suck? Answer me this question: Why?rimnet00

Two words: Tech Demo

At least we're seeing these things and how they're going to be implemented into the game. Tech demo or not, they're still being shown off. Everyone saw Killzone 2 "tech demo" and went absolutely crazy over it.

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts
Personally, I think this is going to be a great game. We've seen(so far) Molyneux delivering on his promises in the vids for this game. Don't so quick to jump on the hate train just because the first game didn't deliver al the promised features. Some of you are saying "look past the fanboyism", well, I'm asking you the same thing. The first game was a very solid RPG. If you look past what was promised, ignore all that, and play as if you just picked up the game as a regular person, the game is actually quite fun. People just got too caught up in the hype and formed a bias when the game underperformed what was promised. Sure it was a dissapointment, but the game was good. Now we know molyneux is delivering on his statements, why can't people think this game will be good? Everyone seems to think Killzone 2 will be amazing because of it's graphics. Really. That's just about allw e have to base it on, because for all we know the gameplay could turn out like the first, which was broken. Now, look at Fable. We have lots of gameplay footage showing off many features, yet many still say it will suck? Answer me this question: Why?
Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts
Stuck a 4-pin power into a cpu fan connector on the mobonot knowing what it was for). Ended up having the wholle thing go up in smoke first boot and burning 2 wires on my PSU.
Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts
[QUOTE="achilles614"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"][QUOTE="3picuri3"]well this appears to be a thread[QUOTE="sadikovic"][QUOTE="MortalDecay"]

[QUOTE="sadikovic"]Ima get this for sure... but for the 360 it dont belong.Meu2k7

Psst...your fanboy is showing.

I have a 360 and have nothing against it... im against companies dumbing down brilliant franchises and cutting corners for the console gamers though.

cry me a river. go load up your old dos fallout games then and play alone with the lights out. i'll be here in the future trying out new things, not being so damned afraid of change, and definitely not acting like some paranoid preservationist / purist.

Needlessly agressive arnt you? why change what wasnt broken?

That is just a stupid statement, change is good and just because it isn't broken doesn't mean it can't be improved. Now if change harms your precious fallout then that blows, I know I would hate it if they ruined TES series...oh wait

WRONG, change is not always good, it works both ways, thats just a stupid statement to a stupid statement.

Ruin TES? no ... make a lackluster sequal praised for its graphics ... yes.

See, with the elder scrolls though they had 360 in mind from the beginning, so many features i was excited for(like the ability have wanted posters of you, or make a person live on the street and take their home,etc.) were cut out because of the lack of power on the 360. With all they cut out they still had framerate issues. They killed what I was expecting to be a masterpiece. ith Fallout 3, I'm not saying it will be bad, but chances are, it's not going to be as good as could have been...

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts
olddd, but still pretty funny
Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts

[QUOTE="Greyhound222"]It's called poor optimization.Violet-Eye

That's not an excuse. Ubisoft knows how to optimize games

Not well obviously. Crysis minimumm requirements are less then that. Stop kidding yourselves. It is poor optimization. Wake-up and smell the coffee

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts

Mine is 1.99 on the 360. I hate the game. I stopped playing it about 2 months ago...just got boring after i got to level 7 prestige. I played it to much in a short period of time. And the only thing i played was Search and Destroy...so its alot harder to camp and you die alot more often. Im around 20000+kills and around 10000 deaths.

SaintTheKing

20,000 kills, and 10,000 deaths? I've got about 150 hrs logged on this game, and i dont even have close to that amount of kills or deaths...You had to play a LOT in that short amount of time.

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts
[QUOTE="Logan832"]

[QUOTE="Meu2k7"]Tell me how to check on the PC version and I'l let you know, though ive only played it for 6 hours xDMeu2k7

Just go to leaderboards, kills, and it shows your your k/d ratio.

I cant seem to find it, I guess the 360 version actually has a + over the PC? :P

just go to your sats and shows your kill and deaths, and you just do kills divided by deaths and you get your number

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts

hes real good with a sniper, but why is he jumping around like its halo?SaintTheKing

He's playing on the 360....durrr