O_Lineman17's forum posts

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts

There's a lot of talk going around that Halo 3 is crap compared to The Orange Box.

Let's get this straight. TOB has so many different games in it, that it got a 9.5 for its content. Do you think that any of those games alone could have gotten a 9.5?

HL2? No, the first one didn't even get that.

HL2 Eps 1&2? Nope, both are too short.

TF2? Ha, with 6 maps, an unoriginalclass-based system and zero customization, I think not.

Portal? Hooray for puzzle games....:?

It is all of those put together that make it a 9.5 worthy package. Now lets compare that with Halo 3's modes:

A variably long campaign depending on difficulty (trust me you can make it extremely brutal with skulls) that is as diverse as it is exciting (Halo 3 has the biggest battle in videogame history: 2 Scarabs - need I say more?) and with a replayability level that has made it very exciting for me the third time through, Halo 3's sp campaign (or MP campaign ;)) is unrivaled even by its predecessors. Worthy of a 9.0 if it shipped by itself, no question.

The MP in Halo 3 is utterly unmatched. The clean interface, the spot-on gameplay; everything feels so nice and pristine. Halo iseasily the most prestigous console shooter series ever, and the consistently rated games tend to agree. With unrivaled on consoleor PC matchmaking, Halo's ranked game and party system are always light years ahead of anything else. Then comes custom games, with the Forge and Saved Films... it it just an unparralled experience in Halo 3 MP. No question this deserves a 9.5 on its own.

No lets look at what we know: TOB shipped with a bunch of pretty good games. Halo 3 shipped with 2 unbelievably high quality features. Only through a combination of those 5 games could TOB ever have been rated so high. None of those games by themselves could match Halo 3. The multiplayer isn't deep enough, and the campaign isn't replayable enough. Plain and simple. Halo 3 >>>>>> TOB by a very large margin.

Uncle_Uzi

Half Life 2(and everything in Orange Box) is better than Halo 3. I would even put the original Half Life 's campaign ahead of Halo 3. That's just personal preference. I own Halo 3, and it's fun, but not that amazing. Great game, but not Half Life caliber IMO

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts

[QUOTE="jet052006"]Dont you get to make your own character in Mass Effect?Hihatrider87

i don;t think so... i think your either a pre-set guy or gal.

no, you get to fully customize the face, I think the vid is somewhere on IGN. It looks awesome, the creators said they were able to re-creat George Bush's face in the game.

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts
[QUOTE="gameruk2010"]

[QUOTE="kevy619"]It wasnt that bad, it was like God of War with even lower quality voice acting.MickeyTheNinja

Dont insult my fav game like that, please dont.

Its true

Yeah seemed a lot like God of War, and Heavenly Sword, except for you could block in Conan. I really did not like Heavenly Sword's gameplay, I actually thought some things in conan should have been implemented into heavenly sword's fighting. It's not a good game...just not terrible...

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts

I won't bother posting all the great games out on the 360, because you wouldn't pay attention anyway :roll: (Half of those are multiplatform anyway)Shrapnel99

Correction, only 3 aren't multiplatform...gahh I hate flamebait threads

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts

Wow, they still haven't improved the gameplay? :?

At least the graphics look good....and at gamespot that'll drive it to a high AA, sad.

flclempire

You ever play KOTOR? This is what this is game is going to be like, except with a totally revamped combat system. This game looks AMAZING. KOTOR was a story driven game where you work your way through several planets, and is one of my favorites RPG's to date (yes, I've played lot of other RPG's, JRPG's don't interest me though). Mass Effect will be AAA easy, quote me.

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts
[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"][QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]

[QUOTE="michael098"]You cows are getting excuses mixed up with the truth. Its TRUE the xbox 360 has more exclusive AAA than ps3, so that means the excuse " bu bu butteh ps3 has no good gamez" is in fact the TRUTH. Another good one is gameplay over graphics, well I'm sure most of us can agree that the most important aspect of a game is its gameplay.ff7isnumbaone

The 360 has 1 AAAE over which can be argued whether it is exclusive or not. The PS3 has 0 AAAEs so far. There's not much of a frontier between the two.

360 has6 AAA over the ps3s

gears of war- first year

forza

halo3

graw-first year

perfect dark-first year

bioshock

Over the PS3, sure. In general, however, it has either 0 or 1. PDZ doesn't count as an AAAE, by the way.

why doesnt pdz count? it got AAA here when it first came out, halo3 and graw and forza if you dont count the pc/360 exclusive which i dont know why you would we are talking about 360vsps3

Pdz suck, most lemmings dont even like it. gears on pc on nov. graws on pc too.

Yea I didn't like the game, but we go by GS's scores and they gave it AAA so it counts

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts
[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"][QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]

[QUOTE="michael098"]You cows are getting excuses mixed up with the truth. Its TRUE the xbox 360 has more exclusive AAA than ps3, so that means the excuse " bu bu butteh ps3 has no good gamez" is in fact the TRUTH. Another good one is gameplay over graphics, well I'm sure most of us can agree that the most important aspect of a game is its gameplay.ff7isnumbaone

The 360 has 1 AAAE over which can be argued whether it is exclusive or not. The PS3 has 0 AAAEs so far. There's not much of a frontier between the two.

360 has6 AAA over the ps3s

gears of war- first year

forza

halo3

graw-first year

perfect dark-first year

bioshock

Over the PS3, sure. In general, however, it has either 0 or 1. PDZ doesn't count as an AAAE, by the way.

why doesnt pdz count? it got AAA here when it first came out, halo3 and graw and forza if you dont count the pc/360 exclusive which i dont know why you would we are talking about 360vsps3

Pdz suck, most lemmings dont even like it. gears on pc on nov. graws on pc too.

Yea I didn't like the game, but we go by GS's scores and they gave it AAA so it counts

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts
[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]

[QUOTE="michael098"]You cows are getting excuses mixed up with the truth. Its TRUE the xbox 360 has more exclusive AAA than ps3, so that means the excuse " bu bu butteh ps3 has no good gamez" is in fact the TRUTH. Another good one is gameplay over graphics, well I'm sure most of us can agree that the most important aspect of a game is its gameplay.Hexagon_777

The 360 has 1 AAAE over which can be argued whether it is exclusive or not. The PS3 has 0 AAAEs so far. There's not much of a frontier between the two.

360 has6 AAA over the ps3s

gears of war- first year

forza

halo3

graw-first year

perfect dark-first year

bioshock

Over the PS3, sure. In general, however, it has either 0 or 1. PDZ doesn't count as an AAAE, by the way.

you serious? Ummm....we go by GS's scores here, and in that case...PDZ is AAAE

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts

I wish I would have seen this thread before I posted this in the other one.

"So what if the 360 has a high fail rate, at least MS extended the warranty to 3 years." Yeah like that is actually fixing the problem.

"It is worth paying for XBL because of what all it offers." You keep thinking that while PC/PS3 owners get everything you get but for free.

"Japan is bias against the 360 because it is a US console." Biggest BS if I ever heard one.

"Sales don't matter are aren't important." OK. The only reason ya'll started saying that is because the Wii surpassed the 360 in sales. If I remember correctly ya'll sure thought sales mattered or were important when MS said they had sold 10 million consoles before 2007 which was a complete lie. And now you obviously think sales are important again since ya'll have been bragging about Halo 3 selling 2.5 million copies and that the 360 outsold the Wii for a week.

"Sony releasing a lower priced SKU just shows they are desperate." I thought as gamers we want the price of a console to go down. And didn't you lemmings say ya'll like choice? So why are ya'll getting upset that Sony is releasing another SKU.peaceful_anger

Why are you using ya'll so much... :/

and you sound kind of biased to me, well the part about paying for XBL, because currently XBL does have a better online service than PS3's, and anyone who has played both would know, so for now, the payments are justified.