[QUOTE="Olidsc"][QUOTE="kevy619"]I'm sure hermits truely devasted, especially considering they have the superior of both. Oh and standards :wink:.[QUOTE="senses_fail_06"][QUOTE="kevy619"]Ouch, but I saw it coming. Most reviews are AA. I just cant resist rubbing in that Gears (year old console game) > UT3. Hermits deserve to have it rubbed in as well. While we are at it, console shooters > pc shooters now on average. :)kevy619
Hermits are too stubborn/arrogant to even realize the truth.
Your lemming angst is overflowing. Also yes, amongst PC FPS gamers, console FPSes are of a lower standard. In the time it takes you to move your reticle just to aim at someone's general direction, a mouse and keyboard setup could've killed two people, vastly increasing the necessity of fast reaction time and precision aim. When you die or kill someone in a console shooter, you see it coming from miles away. With a PC shooter, you can die at any moment if you slip up, leading to a much more intense game. Whether or not one or the other is more fun is a personal opinion, but some people just prefer games where skill is displayed more prominently.
if you say so... thats just preference of a contol input. Not a different standard of video game.
Well yes, but (at least back in the old days) the game was usually built with the control scheme in mind. Things like run speed, reticle size, hitbox size...etc are all vastly different. Just compare UT, Quake, or Counter strike to Halo or killzone.
Log in to comment