Superman has beating the hulk on a few occasions. now it's possible that if the fight when long enough and the hulk was allowed to get angry enough then he could win but superman usually realizes that Hulk is getting stronger and ends it fast.
Gallup has it having gone up a point since the midterms to 45%. that's not really bad actually. historically it's about average of what presidents have after a midterm.
So why won't they fix it then ? If I had it my way I'd base matchmaking of the players average kill and assist to death ratio.kage_53
first. the match making is based on ELO which is calculated based on who you beat. they can't do it based on K/D/A ratios because then who would want to play tanks?
It does a fairly good job IMO. all the best players will tell you that they can solo to the top on their own. if you're good then all things being equal you'll win more than you lose. heck if you're really good you'll carry your team not just with kills but also in directing them.
if you're the one that's having a good score then you're team is much more likely to listen to you if you say something in a constructive way. it works. Like i usually tell ppl i lane with not to autoattack all the time. just last hit unless we're looking to gank soon or they left the lane.
Things like this make long even more for a flat tax. Maybe two: One for businesses and one for individuals. Both with minimum deductions (dependants for people and perhaps insurance for companies).
rawsavon
It is all how you 'do the numbers' (expense, revenue, etc). Your 'flat tax' rate would accomplish nothing except for hurting the poor
exactly. closing loopholes and corporate welfare should be first.
Log in to comment