Gabe Newell may hate the PS3 however when he did mention the interesting concept of doing away with graphics cards entirely and haviong all tasks done over a number of cores, he was obviously talking about PC's with quad to 8 cores but the same concept applies.

Also some games dont need AA that much Crysis doesant its hardly noticable in the demo with it off entirely.

As gamers we all have to follow reviews closely because unlike other reviewed art forms, books or films theres more danger, because its more costly if we misspend, so we become caught up, its also that we can be more critical as we play if its been reviewed badly, which warps our experience of something we were looking forward to greatly.

Thats why there are a lot of annoyed Bioware fans here that are annoyed that dont care about the childish indulgences of system wars even if the other day they were greedily partaking of them.

For my annoyed part however it seems unfair because by the same harsh logic as the Mass Effect review Stalker deserves a 6 for bugs and Knights of the Old Republic a 7.5 for loading times that are frequent and loooong, and Phantom an 8 for the temple of the ocean king.

Also this Kevin Van Ord guy was the one who 8.5'd Metroid Prime.

capcom doesant usually develop for the Pc epic does, as certainly does Microsoft the daddy of Direct X

Also I thought this would have come out ages ago because the Nvidia controll panel has settings for GOW