Umm yeah that makes no sense... You already have the internet connection, the system, and the games, but you still want to pay an extra $50 a year for things you aready have?

It may be worth $50 but still makes no sense to want to pay it :S

So... how would you charge the controller without USB though? You would have to use your PC then... As lame as that is with the Ipod, it would be even lamer if you had to do that on the 40 gig PS3.

The world has officially disolved into sku-hell.

[QUOTE="FrozenLiquid"]

[QUOTE="-Renegade"]they problaby just ran out of money... seriously the production in the game is jaw dropping... it rivals some of hollywood's biggest blockbusters.DXGreat1_HGL

:lol:

Wow, ignorance FTL.

We're only just touching the production values of some independent movies mate.

So why can't a short game be good? I want FACTS, not meaningless opinions of someone who probably has never played it.

Wth is wrong with you people who say DS games have no depth? All of the ones I've played have plenty of depth. I advise getting a DS and an Ipod. DS games are > PSP games to me, and without a doubt Ipod multimedia > PSP multimedia. Put a DS Lite and an Ipod together, and their probably about the same size. Technically you can surf the interwebz on the DS, and you can get all the homebew you want on the PC you're currently on. Though I still say that it's pretty bad that one of the main selling points of the PSP is illegal.

Anyway, am I the only one getting really friggin tired of the these DS or PSP topics?

Flaws with super mario galazy: The Wii controls are unappealing to the hardcore gamer, and the game will likely become more easy and approachable to go with the Wii casual game strategy.

Mass Effect: from what I've seen of the combat system, it looks only decent. The tactical screen looks slightly cumbersome (though as good as it could have gotten under the circumstrances).

Ratchet and Clank: Frankly, the fact that the game concept doesn't seem to have advanced that far is a viable concern for gamers. Every step in a series is supposed to bring the game further, like how jak 2 added magic powers, and jak 3 added more magic powers which changed the gameplay. This is also a problme with Halo 3, which looks to have not advanced enough from its previous iterations. Games don't exist in a vacuum, so comparing them to both their predecessors and the games around them is a fair thing to do.

There, i guess I've outnegatived your games, but I agree, those games are flawless. I had to nitpick to think of anything wrong with them at all. I look forward to seeing how they all turn out.

osirisomeomi

The TC said besides your gaming preference, and what you said about SMG is clearly a preference.

[QUOTE="mistervengeance"]no body cares about singel plauyer in smash. its a party gametidus222

if it doesnt have online it wont be fun at all though

and even if it does have online its gonna be the dumb friend codes

The first two didn't have online, but they were fun.

Considering I hate CS and have never touched it I couldn't tell ya.Vandalvideo

If you've never touched it, how do you know you don't like it?

Even though I agree 110% that VC games shouldn't count...

How does that make the games less fun?

What are you talking about? o.O

Anyway, I wish I could find those first two in store SOMEWHERE...