How much of a disadvantage, would it be signifcant enough for me to run out and spend money on a new MB. I will eventually get a new one but I want to hold off as long as I can.xenophos

You may cannot feel the speed losing but the framerate which goes twice more will go like the PCI-E 1.0. but I am sure that you won't feel it.

Anyway why don't you try it at your old mobo, when it has crashes and other problems you buy a new one? You won't lose nothing with trying it...

[QUOTE="Owyns"]

[QUOTE="DiabeticDood"]I got an older Web Cam from the late 90's or so and I can't seem to find the drivers for it. I know it's really old but I would like to see if I can get it working before going out and buying a new one. I've been on google for hours and can't seem to find one web site that will have the drivers. It's a Ezonics EZcam USB the Model Number is P10U. Thanks for the help ;)DiabeticDood

Maybe helps http://www.driverfiles.net/Cameras/Other-Companies/Ezonics-ez-cam-usb-II-model-p10uc/download/page,sh,22645,438,17,.html

Thats USBII. Mines just USB.

Try this that will make a driver scan at your computer after you will get information or you will be able to download that driver http://scan.driverguide.com/scan.php

Toms Hardware has VGA benchmarks for most video cards, although they do not typically test the utter junk such as the two you chose to saddle yourself with (I haven't looked for them there lately, so it could've changed). Elsewhere on this page is a discussion of Assassins Creed, which won't run at all well on an X1300, (my estimate at high resolution is 6 FPS max) but it will sorta run. That game would look almost like a snail with most any 64 Bit video device, surely (I'd name 4 FPS as the high resolution max, IMO).

I will admit to making an exaggeration in the initial off the cuff comment above, to your opening query, about twice the performance, since the overall architecture of the HD 2*** included improvements, such that the 2400 overcomes a respectable part of its deficit, and should sit roughly 30-40 % below the X1300, about where that X1300 in turn sits below a Radeon 9800 Pro.

Kiwi_1

More clear. :) Thanks.

But is there any driver fix, or patch that will help a bit for this reason?

[QUOTE="TMallory2482"][QUOTE="Owyns"]

[QUOTE="TMallory2482"]You guys think it'll run/look better than the 360 version?daytona_178

Are you crazy! :D

It never cannot run like at a XBOX 360 with your computers specifications, althought there you can get crashes, but at XBOX 360 very rarely.

Agreed!

Sorry for worse English than yours. :) Text edited read again!

You guys think it'll run/look better than the 360 version?TMallory2482

Are you crazy! :D

The game named Mass Effect playing on XBOX360 and PC has a great graphics difference. So you never until a day when a new PC graphics card will release, you cannot play the games at PC like playing at XBOX360, the main reasons are that at PC the game will crash but at XBOX360 very rarely, the details at XBOX360 are better than playing at Computer.

My motherboard (http://www.intel.com/products/motherboard/dg965ot/index.htm) has 1 PCI express X16. The graphics card I want to get says that it uses a PCI express 2.0, can I still put the new card into a regular PCI express slot, or do i need a motherboard with a PCI 2.0?

xenophos

PCI-express 2.0 is backwards compatible with 1.0 so you are all set with your current board.ct1615

Yeah true, but it has a dis-adavantage that your card will work at PCI-E 1.0 speed about (2GB/ps) while with PCI-E 2.0 works twice.

Does anyone know how to remove a hard drive out of a laptop?RATLIFF2008

At the backside (down-face) of your notebook you will see two open-enabled cases. The one which is smaller and writes HDD or DDR on it open it and take it out.

I got an older Web Cam from the late 90's or so and I can't seem to find the drivers for it. I know it's really old but I would like to see if I can get it working before going out and buying a new one. I've been on google for hours and can't seem to find one web site that will have the drivers. It's a Ezonics EZcam USB the Model Number is P10U. Thanks for the help ;)DiabeticDood

Maybe helps http://www.driverfiles.net/Cameras/Other-Companies/Ezonics-ez-cam-usb-II-model-p10uc/download/page,sh,22645,438,17,.html

Simple. An X1300 is at least TWICE as good a device, because it has 128 Bit memory, instead of super cheap 64 Bit memory. Kiwi_1

first of all hes got the better CPU, but its mainly due to the the 64 bit interface of the HD2400 you have. the X1300 were a decent line of GPU's both mobile and desktop version from using it they could do decent in games where you would write it off.yoyo462001

So this is the only problem?

What just my one is 64Bit and his one is 128Bit?

Confused :S

At my computer I have an Nvidia GeForce 7300LE 512MB and 64Bit so there the FPS is about 60 Rate?

First it's great to meet you all here, tryied to help alot at some topics, hope am helpful to you.

If we look to my question I am asking you for a notebook which one has these specifications:

CPU: AMD Athlon X2 - 1.81GHz

RAM: 2GB DDR2-667MHz

GPU: ATi Mobility Radeon HD2400 - 128MB ( But shared about 824MB)

HDD: WD-160GB SATA 5400RPM

And the question is what I play Warcraft 3 Frozen of Throne v1.21 edition. At the game I have a very low FPS rate, it's about 20-30 but often goes under 10FPS.

But at my friends notebook who one has an ATI Mobility Radeon X1300 (128MB) runs the game as well at 60FPS. (BTF-My notebook sepcifications are better than his one (1GB-RAM, 1.7GHz Core2Duo 2xxx.)

So my question is where is the problem that I run the game at lower FPS rate and he runs better.