More people bough mgs4, more people played mgs 4, more people voted for mgs4, as simple as that. Everyone who's played both knows Crysis has superior graphics.
Battlefield and CoD 4 are definitely more flushed out and smooth online experience. BFBC rewards teamwork and CoD 4 rewards skill. MGO is just running around pulling off headshots. MGS 4 was great and MGO was decent, don't state that it is the best online shooter because I bet that 95% of gamers will disagree w/ you.
The outdated graphics are not too bad, but some older games have bad controllers or controls which makes them hard to play. Like the flashback in mgs 4 the camera was very hard to use.
Rent both and buy the one you liked better. They both have similar gameplay. Dark Sector has more satisfying kills and more interesting enemies, rent both, it's like 8 bucks at blockbuster.
Actually my friends disc reader broke. He was playing cod and his friend wanted to play gh. So cod got jealous and broke the system. Actually his friend took the disc out while it was running and it broke it.
DOn't underestimate Killzone2. It has a 40million dollar budget, been worked on for 4 YEARS (thats the whole lifesapn of resistance1 and 2) Have u not seen how this game will revolutionize the console! It has the best graphics, adds then new cover system to FPS, is huge technical masterpiece. I just hope SONY will not release these 2 games close to each other so it wouldnt mess up sales.bluray29
I hope KZ 2 will be awesome, but as of now it revolutionizes nothing. The first person cover system is just like RS:V cover (in first person, not really new). The graphics are revolutionary (for a console). Games do not need to revolutionize to be great, like CoD 4, because as long as they do everything very well. CoD 4 brought nothing new to the table, aside form perks, but since it executed everything perfectly it is, imho, goty.
Log in to comment