[QUOTE="PRowcester"]

[QUOTE="IceAxe18"]

The graphics suck in Doom 1 and 2, so I bought Quake 2 because the graphics were cool in those days. Then when Doom 3 came out I was impressed by the graphics, so I bought Doom 3 for the first time, and thought that the story and graphics was good. I also thought that the Doom The Movie was cool to.

a_sh0pping_cart

Yeah, doom wasn't a terrible movie. Its a standard action movie. The FPS scene was definitely very cool. I loved it.

Haha, I have to agree with that. Nothing really wrong about the Doom movie and FPS scene paid homage to the game. Kinda cool

There was a lot of hate at the time for the movie, but I thought it was enjoyable. I guess it depends on the expectations. the one cool part was the FPS. That was really good stuff.

The graphics suck in Doom 1 and 2, so I bought Quake 2 because the graphics were cool in those days. Then when Doom 3 came out I was impressed by the graphics, so I bought Doom 3 for the first time, and thought that the story and graphics was good. I also thought that the Doom The Movie was cool to.

IceAxe18

Yeah, doom wasn't a terrible movie. Its a standard action movie. The FPS scene was definitely very cool. I loved it.

There's nothing terribly wrong with Quake 4 and DOOM3 as the quality and production values of both SP and MP are equal with Id's previous releases. It's the fact that they lack completely in any sort of innovation that's bad. kdawg88

[QUOTE="PRowcester"]

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]Crysis is an unoptimized pos. The damn game only uses 50% of my gpu. TerrorRizzing

It isn't unoptimized dude. Works quite well on 570. Playing it on enthusiast setting at 1920x1200. Getting around 40-45FPS most of the time, and I am on a single gpu, mind you.

I suppose you are right. But you see, there is no winning for Crytek here. They put out a game that works on a lot of systems, and forums are full of hate because the game isn't making use of their latst GPUs. They gave us Crysis, which is demanding, and people complain that its unoptimized.

Look, they can't go to each and every gamer and ask them their definition of a perfect game. It just doesn't work that way.

I guess we need to keep our expectations in check.

My complaints on Crysis 2 are more about lack of quick save and so on. I am fine with the grapics in both the games.

Crysis is an unoptimized pos. The damn game only uses 50% of my gpu. millerlight89

It isn't unoptimized dude. Works quite well on 570. Playing it on enthusiast setting at 1920x1200. Getting around 40-45FPS most of the time, and I am on a single gpu, mind you.

What i did was simply speculate and predict how its gonna turn out judging by their actions and there is nothing biased about that. dakan45

Oh I see. So speculations are not assumptions...that's good to know.

Considering your joining date and how i was absent from the forums for a while, i fail to see how you "know" that i hate on everything. Also i gave them multiple chances and they spit on my facedakan45

They spat on your face?? Damn, you are hardcore! This is sparta! :lol:

Its a game dude. Relax. lol.

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"][QUOTE="dakan45"]Honestly they got to upgrade so many things, that some gimmicky dx11 features wont change much.dakan45