PandaBear86's forum posts

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
Games were just simply better in the 90's. Back then, making games was treated as an artwork. Nowadays, games are just simply a bunch of IPs trying give the most financial returns to the shareholders. Thats why most games try to emphasize DLC instead of polishing the game or fixing bugs etc. Thats why so many games have cookie-cutter storylines (nobody cares about having a god story anymore, its all just graphics and explosions that matter). Video games were way better in the 90's. Developers were actually allowed to have imaginations, compared to today "Let's copy Call of Duty and hope we make billions of dollars" :(
Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
I remember reading some article from a university student (a woman) who states that men are more attractive than women, because women apparently do cheat by putting excessive makeup. Meanwhile, most men like myself barely ever brush our hair. What do you think a supermodel looks like when she wakes up in the morning? She would look like a trainwreck in comparison to photoshopped images you see in magazines. The same thing goes for animals - male peacocks are more beautiful than females. Perhaps animals view human males to be more attractive than human females?
Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
1) Too expensive 2) Not many games 3) Dedicated handhelds are struggling thanks to smartphones and tablets 4) Nintendo 3DS is dominating it 5) Sony in general is suffering financially. They are no longer the same super-giant they were 15 years ago.
Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
Yes, competition is a good thing.nintendoboy16
Very true, but are you certain that smartphones, tablets and PC gaming aren't enough competition? Thats what I have been thinking about recently.
Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts

I was wondering something: do we really need three different gaming companies to make consoles in todays market? If I asked this same question back in 2006, most people would obviously disagree. After all, we need competition to encourage innovation and better prices for consumers. However, in todays market, where competition from smartphones, tablets, browser-based games and free-to-play games are taking a big bite out of the gaming market, I can't help but think that we only need one console manufacturer (okay, maybe two just in case) these days. Right now, we have three manufaturers and several dedicated gaming devices, with Wii U coming over the horizon. Combine all of these devices with various gaming options for smartphones, tablets, and PCs etc, and you have to admit that the gaming market is heavily fragmented into many tiny pieces. Over-fragmentation is never a good thing. Keep in mind that developers hate making games for multiple platforms as well.

So, what are your thoughts on this? If I had to choose, I would ask Sony to leave the console hardware market and become a third party publisher, or even focus on making Android games. Nintendo will dominate the dedicated handheld and traditional console market, while Microsoft will have an awesome community for XBL since all PSN users would jump ship.

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
Perfect World is a cool game. You can play as a Pandaman, Tigerman, Wolfman, Lionman etc which is 100% pure awesome :)
Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
Those pictures are very stupid. Those faces actually have MORE flaws and wrinkles than what you see in real life. A man in his 30's does not have ugly wrinkles and skins pores like that. Terribly stupid, and I am happy that Wii U will have similar power to 360 and PS3.
Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts

I would absolutely LOOOOVE to use those voice commands on a PS Vita version of Skyrim if that actually happened. Imagine shouting "FUS-ROH-DAH!!!" on a busy train! :lol:

(Obvious sacasm, but you have to admit, it would be pretty hilarious)

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

It takes 100$ just for the screen

ChubbyGuy40

4-5in touch-screens do not cost $100. More like around a few bucks.

True. It used to cost a lot more a few years ago, but today, touchscreens are dirt cheap thanks to all those phones and tablets which are increasing production rates and getting prices down.
Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

20

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
The reason why the PS3 is still expensive is because it is still a huge console. Its bigger and heavier than the original PS2, so theres a limit to how cheap it can be. If Sony released a super-slim PS3 with smaller chipsets, then yes, it would be much cheaper as well.