I can live without Online, the VC is doing fine enough for me, big titles are coming. But I REALLY want more in depth games, I hate ****ing mini-games.O_Rly_FTW

Well, if this is true, its a completely stupid idea. Just put the tracks INTO the game. Its not that hard.

Just another example of microsoft price gouging there customers in idiotic ways.

Going666

i'll be content with my premium 360 until MS figure out a resolve for transferring existing hdd data & gamerscores to the Elite?
- i'm over 15K in achievement points...and i want to keep it ! :P

 

 

nascar1

[QUOTE="PantsOfFury"][QUOTE="darksusperia"]no no no!!! no freaking cover system in halo..good for realistic games, graw, R6 etc not for halo.JOHN117_basic

Whoa! This must be a sore spot for you. Are you one of those guys who says, "I would have won except..."? I'm not exactly playing videogames so I can put it on my job resume. I guess I have a lack of skill, because I like using a radar, then I don't have to spend the whole time looking for someone to shoot.

Isn't it a little silly to compare videogames to real sports? I know that in a real gunfight you wouldn't have a radar, but you'd also not be able to reappear five seconds after you got killed.

aransom

no no no!!! no freaking cover system in halo..good for realistic games, graw, R6 etc not for halo.darksusperia

[QUOTE="PantsOfFury"]somebody being able to see your screen sets you up for failure, then I can't stand it...aransom

Can't you look at your oppenent's screen and set them up for failure too?

There's nothing wrong with splitscreen. It's a lot cheaper than buying multiple consoles.

Doing LAN parties with multiple consoles in a house and people who are on the same team playing on the same screen is fine. But think about it. If you're playing a Capture the Flag match and you have to hide until your teammates can return your own flag for you to be able to score, is it exactly fun to have somebody being able to see where you are, regardless of whether they should be able to in-game? It might be for you, but to me it just shows a lack of skill and would be the equivalent of somebody hitting off a Tee in a competitive baseball league.

You people might not know this...but i am a very manly man...i have big hands...the lite must be for little kids because its really not comfortable...

 

So in conclusion Big DS is for real Men...DS lite is for little kids..

senecaboyer88

I happened to find the fat DS very uncomfortable simply because it was shaped in such an awkward way that you'd have to have deformed, not large, hands to be able to play comfortably for more than about 30 minutes. The DS lite, though basically rectangular (which typically isn't that comfortable of a shape to hold for very long in the way you hold a DS), is much more comfortable for my rather large hands. Hand size has almost nothing to do with how comfortable a controller/handheld is to use. Button placement and shape of the controller/console are what makes comfort. Look at the XBOX 360 or Gamecube controller. Those are widely viewed by people of nearly every size as the most comfortable controllers for any console.

Being someone who could palm a regulation sized basketball at age 10, you can imagine that in the 10 years that have passed since then that they have grown quite a bit more. The old DS nor the DS lite isn't for "Manly Men". It's a matter of preference based on shape/button placement.