your statement would be correct,if it applied also to other franchises(CoD is a prime example),but facts show us different since CoD games are getting an average of 8.5 to 9 in autopilot
yes....the difficulty was elevated,kratos was less angry and a ladder was too long to climb....
also this guy complaints for innovation on a genre that has reached near maximum innovation potential....what breakthrough was he craving for on a hack and slash,combat driven adventure
if you watch closely,i say at least 8.5.AND yes it matters because if you bring down a game for a mediocre multiplayer while it never was its selling point(is seriously anyone buying this game for multiplayer?) then you are lookin at the wrong direction...if they reviewed the newer CoD entries based on their single player campaigns,the series would not pass the 5/10 mark
the multiplayer for me is irrelevant....it wont affect my opinion of the game whatsoever...from what ive seen and heard this is as good as the previous entries are....the already amazing graphics on GoW 3 are improved to the maximum......so far the only "drawback" is that the gameplay isnt very innovative,but why would you wanna change an already amazing formula? if it aint broke dont fix it......i think this review should be at least 8.5,especially in comparison with the review's of the rest of the series
Paoksis' comments