The amount of particles, volumetric smoke and HDR in the fire are insane for such a frequently used effect. It's not a canned animation like in BF4, it has HDR in the flame unlike in Crysis 3. It's perfect just like it's Killzone.

 

gpuking

.

People over looking bit of info

KZ SF will not have an always true 40,000 polygon characters. The way they are going to allow 40k npc models is when there is only one npc within the distance of 0-2, the more npc's on screen within a certain distance the LOD quality count lowers

04dcarraher

You're implying Crysis 3 doesn't use LOD scaling either. SFs character models have more detail and polygons than Crysis 3s, at all LODs

Infamous Second Son. The destruction and physics makes Crysis 3 look like Pacman in comparison, and it's open world :shock:

[QUOTE="Indicud"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] that was from gameplay :P this too hartsickdiscipl

It's a good-looking game.  Notably good?  Not really.  It's nothing we haven't seen already seen bested.  

If it were a PC exclusive, hermits would be fapping over it. :roll:

Let's bring a does of reality into this thread. KZ:SF has surpassed Crysis 1, BC2, and possibly Crysis 2 and BF3. But not MLL and definitely not Crysis 3. With that said, Crysis 1 wins on the realism factor. Crysis 3 beats every game to date on realism as well as overall. But after the terrible shots I saw of Crysis 1, I think it needs a little redemption. Crysis 1 can look amazing and almost real at times. 

 

SentientMind

Crysis 1, really? :? It looked good at launch, but holy shit hermits, give it a rest.

Too bad the actual models in game dont look like that :cry:

 

Too bad they look comparable with a 2 generation old game from PC.

 

 

Bu bu but the 40k tris and bu bu but the 8GB GDDR5 :cry:

 

SchnabbleTab

Oh shit, I lol'd so hard :lol:

Holy shit

OP didn't watch the E3 event :?

They're still making PS2 games? :?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMyoCr2MnpM

:?