Phelaidar's forum posts
[QUOTE="MasterYevon"]The hype being that the legendary FPS developer iD, using a new engine, was making this....what could go wrong??? ...wait...WHAT?!? The new engine looks good, but the "unique textures" stuff was just stupid. It made the game unnecessarily huge. Some textures could easily be repeated and utilized in clever ways. And the story just doesn't do the animations nor the setting any favors.But, overall, I'm not impressed.. It's an entertaining game, an okay game, but shallow. So, what was all the hype about? Am I talking to soon, perhaps? I'll keep playing of course, hopefully I'll be pleasantly surprised later into the game...
solartiger
[QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"]AC is good, runs like crap though for me. They need to fix the peformance already.Elann2008The past two AC games have weird optimization issues. Framerate jumps from 50-60fps constantly. Great games though. But imho, from what I've played so far, Arkham City is the better game. I think he used AC as "Arkham City" and not as "Assassin's Creed". =)
[QUOTE="pills4louis"]
Why do graphics mean so much to you? Silent Hill 2's graphics have held up pretty darn well, and considering you played one of the weakes SH games (Homecoming) you really owe it to yourself to experience what's arguably the best game in the series, if you haven't played it already. Also, check out Fatal Frame 1 and 2 (console only, but excellent horror games.) if you haven't yet. 3 was pretty "meh."
KillerJuan77
Actually, if you think that Silent Hill 2 looks good wait 'til you see Silent Hill 3, it even looks better than many recent games.
Yeah, SH3 looks fantastic, but SH2 is just a better game...
Log in to comment