Plzhelpmelearn's forum posts

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

[QUOTE="Ultimas_Blade"]

Supremacy Clause will sink AZ on this case. Arizona is subordinate to the Federal Government, all states are. Arizona can't go just do illegal things just because it feels like it.

I don't know why Republicans want to act like they aren't American all of the sudden, but they're Arizonian or Texan or whateverfirst and foremost.

collegeboy64

Its against AZ law, as well as against fed law,to rob a bank in AZ. Just like every other state has a law against bank robbery. Same bank, same robbery, dual enforcement, state and fed. When will Obama and Holder be filing 50 more lawsuits demanding injunction against state bank robbery laws?

As to your second point: This nation was formed as a republic of independent states under a constitutionally limited federal government. State governments formed the federal govt, not the other way around. The states are not subdivisions of the federal government.

While I wish your second statement was true, I think the civil war kind of cleared up who was in charge between the federal and state governments.

My two cents is that I don't know if Arizona will lose, but I can't blame them for doing a job that the federal government has refused to for decades. Arizona has asked several times for the federal government to do its job and they have refused, so Arizona is going to do its on its own to protect its interests. When you have only 4 states that border Mexic out of 50, i think it is too easy for the other 46 to ignore problems related to their location.

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

people say that "God has a plan for their lives"? I'm watching a drew brees interview and he gave this as the reason why he was able to cope with all the adversity he faced. I understand that it is a true belief for most people, but I cannot help but feel like it must be convenient to have "God's plan for your life" when you are well off and oozing with talent. Almighty and omnipotent God has a destiny for Drew Brees to achieve in football, but apparantly not for the 6 million children under 5 who die each year of hunger.

Please don't see this as an attack on Drew Brees as I believe he is a great guy who has and does do a lot of good for his community, it is just that statement that grates on my nerves when people use it.

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

BAMBOOZLED. "I went to to the supermarket today and was bamboozled by a portugese rope salesman selling magical peanuts!"

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

I would agree that Nas is one the most consistant rappers lyrically.

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

I don't like the supreme court justices. The ruling that corporations can now give as much money as they want to any politician without tax or documentation kinda sways me in Obama"s favor for this one.Buriz
There is no doubt that this is a ruling that is not beneficial to the individual American citizen, but isn't the supreme court only supposed to enforce the constitution? If election reform is needed (which it is) there are ways to change the constitution to allow for it.

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

[QUOTE="Plzhelpmelearn"][QUOTE="entropyecho"]I never fully understood this argument. I understand 20-somethings are struggling with payments, but if they do not have a safety net in place for their health and they get sick, it will be a lot more money out of their pocket. :?

Ninja-Hippo

That is true, but for most people that won't be the case. I guess the question is whether someone should have the right to take that risk. I am still somewhat uncomfortable with the govt forcing people to pay more money for something they may not want, but perhaps the alternative is worse. However, you all have successfully made me rethink my position on universal healthcare so I am deleting that from my op.

This has to be a first for OT. I commend you sir. :P

haha yeah I hear opinions don't change much around here. I guess when I first heard about the healthcare overhaul, I was uninsured and making next to nothing so I only saw it as another expense that a healthy 20 yr old like myself would have forced on me. I now have a better job that offers insurance that I have opted for (because I do realize I'm only one accident away from complete financial ruin) i still can empathize with other young guys who make next to nothing with no insurance, but as long as there are means to help them I can't say I have a problem with it really.

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

[QUOTE="Plzhelpmelearn"]...but is it fair to force 20 somethings who are struggling to make ends meet to pay additional costs in health insurance that they don't need at the moment? entropyecho

I never fully understood this argument. I understand 20-somethings are struggling with payments, but if they do not have a safety net in place for their health and they get sick, it will be a lot more money out of their pocket. :?

That is true, but for most people that won't be the case. I guess the question is whether someone should have the right to take that risk. I am still somewhat uncomfortable with the govt forcing people to pay more money for something they may not want, but perhaps the alternative is worse. However, you all have successfully made me rethink my position on universal healthcare so I am deleting that from my op.
Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts

[QUOTE="Plzhelpmelearn"][QUOTE="Engrish_Major"]How will they disallow pre-existing condition exemptions without forcing everyone to have health insurance?Engrish_Major
Pretty easy, If someone with pre-existing conditions WANTS insurance, they can't be blocked from getting it at a fair price. I don't see that impossibly linked to mandatory insurance.

But then people will just wait until they require care to buy it, instead of paying for insurance when they are healthy. That would be like allowing people to wait until they get into a car accident before buying auto insurance.

that is actually an interesting point that I had not thought of. Maybe you are right, but maybe not. I guess I have sympathy for people who have cancer or some other debilitating disease, and can't afford care on their own, but is it fair to force 20 somethings who are struggling to make ends meet to pay additional costs in health insurance that they don't need at the moment or forseeably need in the near future? Granted accidents happend and some would get screwed but that is the risk, you know?

Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts
How will they disallow pre-existing condition exemptions without forcing everyone to have health insurance?Engrish_Major
Pretty easy, If someone with pre-existing conditions WANTS insurance, they can't be blocked from getting it at a fair price. I don't see that impossibly linked to mandatory insurance.
Avatar image for Plzhelpmelearn
Plzhelpmelearn

1270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Plzhelpmelearn
Member since 2010 • 1270 Posts
Separation of Power good sir. It's their job to challenge the president. I commend them for them for doing what they were created to do. ferrari2001
However, they not only get to challenge him, but void everything he and congress does. Are you afraid that partisan politics has slipped into the court at all?