I think Bio has more intriguing characters (Ryan) than ME (Saren), but as for just the story, I think ME's is better, grander in scope and just feels a lot cooler to save the universe, as opposed to fighting in a city noone knows about anyway. Don't get me wrong, Bio is the quality of game that come around once every 5 years or so, but just based on story ME as it beat.

On a side note, and I know there is/are thread(s) on this topic, but why did Bioshock not win GOTY? This is why there are so many sequels, copycats, and clones in this industry and movies, Proven commodities always work, and new properties may/may not work but are certainly less known.

Yea both of the Kotor's run bad on the 360.

Also, I love the Arrested Development icon :)

A lot of people actually are pretty upset about ut3. I know people debate halo 3's greatness all the time, but at leasta lot of people play it, not many play ut3.

UT3 has great graphics... and thats about it, maps are nothing special, the weapons got only slight changes, and it was ported over from the console versions, and some of the hardcore PC gamers took that as an insult as the series started on the PC. I loved UT2004, still play it some, and I can barely stand ut3 even for a little while.

The thing with reviews is, you can't just look at the score and decide if it's a good review. Honestly when I read a review, the score is somewhat unimporant, you have to read why it got what score it got. If there is some unintentional reveiwers bias or perhaps something irked them that won' bother you as much you have to take that into consideration.

That said, I'm looking forward to playing AC on Tuesday. :)