Look, I know gameply is more important than graphics, but there is no excuse for an exclusive Wii game of Goldeneye franchise's supposed quality to look like a pre gamecube, almost N64ish! The game looks even worse in splitscreen. What's with these devs that can no longer make splitscreen games?! I believe Timesplitters for the GCN had much better graphics, and the splitscreen games of the N64 and Gamecube had wider screens. Now for some reason all splitscreen games have small screens with terrible to almost N64 graphics!
I can understand smaller screens in a more graphic intensive game, but what is Goldeneye's excuse? The game looks like an old gamecube game. Also I have a flatscreen HD TV, so it's not my fault. Why is it that third party Wii games look so bad? Is it in someway weaker than the GCN, since that system had more consistent distribution of quality graphics among it's games. Star Fox Adventures for the GCN, a game that came out in 2002, looks better than half if not most Wii games out there. Why?
Conker live and reloaded for the Xbox could pass as an early Xbox 360 game, and supposedly the Wii is more capable than the Xbox. Why do Wii third party games look so bad? It is getting rediculous.
Also other than the graphics, Golden eye's gameplay is pretty much a mediocre version of Call of Duty, a waste of my time.
Log in to comment