I paused the game when i first saw Bowser in Mario64, until my aunt pushed me to keep playing, no lie.

In the second game, (though it was only a training mission that meant nothing, so I really don't see how the story connects at all, but anyway) Revolver Occelot has Liquid's arm grafted over the one he lost in the original and it basically takes him over.

vadicta

The second game for the PS2 was a training mission? What?

So the story really takes off in MGS3, then.

I only played Twin Snakes for the GCN, and they were different people. Liquid was snake's bro, and Revolver Ocelot was just a underling boss. I was watching some MGS4 cut scenes and it seems that Revolver is called Liquid? I never had a Playstation, which is why i'm confused with the story.

[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]Do not take into account the marketing and business aspect.

JuarN18

The Wii has problems with third party support even now, so what makes you think a more powerful Wii won't have any support or less than it does now?

[QUOTE="XxLeGitDeErxX"]i think that the wii should of been like a squeal to the game cube. instead of mediocre graphics with a pointing device should of worked on the graphics more. (they must of knew competition was soon to come) i think Nintendo would of made a lot more money as well, what is your guy's say?Gamingclone

Lol, there is a reason why Nintendo was having a very very large profit and was doing nothing but growing during the first 3 (maybe 3 and a half) years of its life cycle, and that is because it was at a much lower price than the HD twins. Why is this, because it had what some SW people like to call, "last gen hardware" (even though I personally disagree), but why in the world did Nintendo go with "last gen hardware" or hardware that seemed last gen? thats simple, because at the time, all the hardware that the 360 and PS3 has was expensive and also the world was just starting to enter the dreaded resession. Nintendo realized this, (or maybe they just made a lucky move) so they decided to go the inexpensive rout with graphics and add something that had never really been done before, motion control. It turned out to be the best move that Nintendo ever made. Lots of Wiis sold, lots of profit was made, and Nintendo seems to have won this generation. So let me repeat myself. Best move ever made!

You people seem to think in the shoes of the large companies that take your money. Why don't you ever think in the perspective of the consumer? Sure the Wii was cheaper, but it was also overpriced for it's outdated hardware, and the games are lack luster. I have been much more satisfied with my GCN, which did terribly last gen, than the Wii. At the very least the GCN had many of the multiplat games and I did not feel as left out as I did initially when I only had a Wii. Also the Wii games are not innovative, I mean they haven't progressed much from last gen. This stagnation in progress is seen in comparison with the AAA titles of the 360/PS3.

Nintendo would be dead by nowJuarN18

Exagerrating much?

So what if Nintendo wouldn't have made as much as they would with the Wii. The games on the Wii are lack luster because of weak hardware and poor priority.

I agree with OP, Nintendo sold it's soul to make cash.

What's the point of expensive handhelds? I rather stick to playing video games at home, since I don't need to play video games when I go out. Also handheld games aren't really that good in my experience.

Battlefront games have always been more fun than Halo games IMO so I hope a new one is coming out.

COD sucks BF BC2 is better.