that's one of my all time fvorite movies. he's not only funny but his character develops really well too. it's surprisingly dark for a Pwe Wee movie. but then again it is tim burton. dissonantblack
he actually had a special on hbo doing the pee wee herman character that was similar to his saturday morning show, but it was way more adult oriented and a bit racier. hbo still runs it now and again. phil hartman and laurence fishburn are in it as that captain sailor guy and cowboy curtis, respectively. i think fishburn played the cowboy on the show too, right?
thats the beauty of it. There is no logical rebuttal.
uncledeath2005
It doesn't win anything. It's pointless. To be honest...you could just post something just as pointless and he couldn't respond. If this is the state of OT.....I'm glad I spend less time here.
No, I think it was just a joke that has been taking way to far out of context.
you think right; it's obvious. from what i've seen of LJS he is either totally humorless to the point he does not "get" when somebody is trying to be funny (whether or not they succeed) or he has aspergers syndrome. his entire life also seems to be based on this board (i've seen posts on his blog where he thanks people for voting for him for forum awards. and he is serious. he fancies himself some kind of skilled debater, but most of his "arguments" are conclusory statements followed by ellipses (an oh so subtle way of telling your opponent "DUHHHHH you are stupid and you had no point there"). basically, he is my favorite poster here.
Yeah I have that.....um I sorry but you did not seem to make a point as too why having Aspergers would inhibit one's abilty to take a joke...please don't talk about conditions you are not aware like you them...thanks
from what i understand of aspergers, people with the disorder commonly (so i guess not always) take things hyper-literally; one byproduct of this would be not understanding when someone is making a joke, or not really finding something funny because they are fixated on the logical impossibility of the components of said joke. for instance, a joke that involves animals talking or something, i would imagine, might leave someone with aspergers saying to himself "but pigs do not talk". at any rate, i would guess, as with all conditions, this characteristic is not universal. and sorry if i offended you.
[QUOTE="ROLFCHANK"]you think right; it's obvious. from what i've seen of LJS he is either totally humorless to the point he does not "get" when somebody is trying to be funny (whether or not they succeed) or he has aspergers syndrome. his entire life also seems to be based on this board (i've seen posts on his blog where he thanks people for voting for him for forum awards. and he is serious. he fancies himself some kind of skilled debater, but most of his "arguments" are conclusory statements followed by ellipses (an oh so subtle way of telling your opponent "DUHHHHH you are stupid and you had no point there"). basically, he is my favorite poster here. LJS9502_basic
:lol: I have no syndrome nor am I humorless.Very hard to tell humor on a forum when it's poorly done. As for thanking people...I'm polite. I'm rarely serious....sorry to disappoint.
you just proved most of my points above. you admitted you have a problem determining when someone is trying to be funny, you replied within two seconds of my posting that, proving you are on here all the time, and you posted conclusory statements followed by ellipses (and as a bonus a smug remark "sorry to disappoint"). actually, i guess you proved all my points. you rule. i am not being sarcastic. later; i'm going to go sit in bed and read. i will log back in here in a day or two.
thats the beauty of it. There is no logical rebuttal.
Mr47fitter
It doesn't win anything. It's pointless. To be honest...you could just post something just as pointless and he couldn't respond. If this is the state of OT.....I'm glad I spend less time here.
No, I think it was just a joke that has been taking way to far out of context.
you think right; it's obvious. from what i've seen of LJS he is either totally humorless to the point he does not "get" when somebody is trying to be funny (whether or not they succeed) or he has aspergers syndrome. his entire life also seems to be based on this board (i've seen posts on his blog where he thanks people for voting for him for forum awards. and he is serious. he fancies himself some kind of skilled debater, but most of his "arguments" are conclusory statements followed by ellipses (an oh so subtle way of telling your opponent "DUHHHHH you are stupid and you had no point there"). basically, he is my favorite poster here.
johnny rotten is as old and washed up as sting, and he reformed the pistols to cash in ten years ago. i do find it kind of funny that he is slagging the police for doing the same thing. the sex pistols were pretty lousy anyway. PIL was really good though.
whatan underhanded thing to do. the thing that gets me is how theyre trying to push it so fast before much of anyone realizes what theyre doing.
one... year... left...
mattg90520
what is "something you should have said in 2006 when this was actually news". did nobody notice all the crawlers about scooter libby pleading not guilty at the bottom of the screen? this is old news. looks like they did push it through without most people noticing or making an issue of it.
I think it's safe to say that the court will lack jurisdiction in this case, lol. Good luck trying to avoid being sanctioned by the judge.GMAN32X
the complaint will be tossed for failure to serve too. i doubt he will be rule 11-ed. there have been other similar suits and i dont know of any sanctions being levied because of it. although this does seem like a really good reason for said sanctions.
Log in to comment