[QUOTE="RRTTWAAA"]
[QUOTE="Renegade_Fury"]
Who the **** cares about spinoffs? Does anyone here play those? Does anyone here say those games are ruining the genre? COD had become ****ing Madden with its annual releases, and those are all main games of the series. Of course no one is going to give a rat's ass off the pokemon spinoffs.
Renegade_Fury
Lol? Now we're just supposed to "forget" about all those worthless Pokémon games primarily developed for the purpose of revenue?
Then continue hanging on something that no one gives a **** about. No one is crying over how pokemon puzzle league is being made annually, and is ruining the puzzle game genre. No one is crying over how pokemon ranger has imitation after imitation and is over saturating the market. It's pretty damn apparent why no one compares how Nintendo milks pokemon versus Activision with COD, but if you wanna keep repeating the same thing after ~300 comments over and over again, who am I to stop you. I'm just stating answering the TC's question flat out.
Wow, you're trying way too hard.
Give it up, just because Nintendo doesn't release Pokémon now as frequently as they used to in the past, doesn't mean that we will forget about how they used to milk the series to death. Not to mention Pokémon has been declining in popularity recently. At least CoD is an AAA franchise!!!
GameSpot:
- It's the same Pokemon formula you've seen before.
And people are complaining about CoD being milked... Face it, CoD will never come near to Pokémon-milkage.
Log in to comment