What about using PC sound system on PS3?

I am actually looking at a a good/satisfying sound system for my PS3.

If anyone can give me any idea on what I should looking for, that will be really good.

At this moment, any system that is less than 100 bucks is acceptable to me.

My place is not that big, so big ass system is not necessary.

Also I have a old sound system for my PC. Since my PC is dead, I may want to use that system for PS3 as well.

Is that possible?

Thank you for ur advice.

Is Xbox 360 games universal, which means imported games can work on domestic console or not?

Thanks

Am i the only one fed up with the jokers that let other jokers near a keyboard on this site. A certain title did not deserve a 7.5 and I have become slightly frustrated with the reviews on here. When all around them are shouting that the game is great, a little sqeak comes from GS 'it has an identity crisis' *sob* 'we couldnt find anything in this game to stop it being AAA' *sob* 'so we just kinda......made stuff up' *sob*Robinho1873

Affirmative.

MGS4 is definitely a 4.5. since it doesnt have multiplayer and Snake's guns are not big enough.

Killzone might get a 9 if they have three lvl of challenges : legendary, normal, easy. and probly throw in some ''cool" gadegets and vehicles (like bicycles)

[QUOTE="_Tobli_"][QUOTE="bbdowalt"]Like most PS3 exclusives this game gets crapped on, Heavenly Sword is to short, R&C is too easy, enough all ready we get it. Meanwhile other systems exclusives are "amazing", "revolutionary", "epics".

This game has amazing visuals, its everything the previous R&C's were just better. I used to respect Gamespot's reviews but it looks like for PS3 reviews its time to move on.

Real3motion

What...Did you just say that HS is underrated? :lol:

I mean seriously the game can be completed easily in about 6 hours, and there is little or no replay value. Not to mention no coop or multiplayer. For that a 8.0 is pretty generous if you ask me.

Maybe just maybe it didn't deserve more than 7,5? Ah well if you just want them to give a high score, and not actually rate the game then i understand why GS wouldn't be suited for you.

Lol. Multiplayer Multiplaer. Ok tell me one thing.... what is so speicall about Halo 3 multiplayer that makes it deserve a AAA?

The story of halo 3 = crap and short. But it still is triple A, care to tell me why?

I guess halo 3 fanboys have never played a online FPS before in theier whole life i guess.

If multiplayer is the only thing we need to concern for next gen games. Let us ask Squarenix stop making any more FF now.

Or how about getting rid of DMC4? or MGS4 ?

Multiplayer Multiplayer.. I am really tired of this word. (What is fun with playing with a bunch of immature kids screaming and cursing with their Hello Kitty voices?)

[QUOTE="bbdowalt"]Like most PS3 exclusives this game gets crapped on, Heavenly Sword is to short, R&C is too easy, enough all ready we get it. Meanwhile other systems exclusives are "amazing", "revolutionary", "epics".

This game has amazing visuals, its everything the previous R&C's were just better. I used to respect Gamespot's reviews but it looks like for PS3 reviews its time to move on.

_Tobli_

What...Did you just say that HS is underrated? :lol:

I mean seriously the game can be completed easily in about 6 hours, and there is little or no replay value. Not to mention no coop or multiplayer. For that a 8.0 is pretty generous if you ask me.

Maybe just maybe it didn't deserve more than 7,5? Ah well if you just want them to give a high score, and not actually rate the game then i understand why GS wouldn't be suited for you.

Lol. Multiplayer Multiplaer. Ok tell me one thing.... what is so speicall about Halo 3 multiplayer that makes it deserve a AAA?

The story of halo 3 = crap and short. But it still is triple A, care to tell me why?

I guess halo 3 fanboys have never played a online FPS before in theier whole life i guess.

I guarantee Gamespot will not give mgs4 over a 8.9, watch

ms will pay big dollars to make sure.

Lock it if you want its just my opinion, But I guess you cant have a opinion here :|

SizeMatterzz

fomr the look of it, probly a 7.5.

Why not we set our expectation at 5 for now? so we will feel better when the actual score comes out next year.

really? it is true?

can someone give the link showing it is a time exclusive? Cant find it on gamespot.

[QUOTE="kenken2g"]cfarias I dont know man. Its clear that the GS review was questionable no doubt. I have heard that people have been voicing their opinions so much that they have been suspended of the site for talking bad about GS. Whew!cfarias

Indeed.

But be mindful that I am sad about the review but not actually bashing the guys at Gamespot. My intention was just to make, what I think, a constructive comment. I think there is room for improvement. If Aaron didn't like the game as most of us did that's fine. It is his opinion and I respect it. But Gamespot is an influential site and reviews such as this can influence A LOT in which games people do buy. I think it would be wiser to have a second and even a third opinion when writing important reviews such as this.

It is sad to know that this suspention practice is in the works here. America used to be a free country. Suspending people for making constructive comments is for the likes of Castro and Chavez.

It is important not to take "personal" preferences into the review.

A reveiw shoiuld only judge wat a game really is, the game pace, stroy, graphic, control, etc.

Apparently Aaron forget about that.

The ending is a letdown? doubt if he has ever played HL2 or Halo 3 in this case. And when did put all good gameplays together becoem a crime? As long as the gameply is good, wat is worng with difficulties?

"A good story would have been nice, but this sort of game is really all about gameplay, so it doesn't hurt too much that one of Tools of Destruction's weakest aspects is its story." that is wat he said, but somehow he took points off based on it.

Funny.