The Xbox 360 is by far, the worst gaming console ever constructed this generation... Let's start with the 70% fail rate that every system came "lovely" packaged with upon release; People can say what they want about PSN being down or the PS3 being over priced on it's release but, it's better than having to re-buy the same system 2 to 3 times in a life cycle because of poorly constructed hardware... (I mean seriousely, who thinks to put "glue" on a CPU?) And then, has the addasitty to post record sales!!! As if, half to maybe 3/4 of that no. isn't because of re-purchasing; Not to mention re-using inferior DvD 9 disc capacity for what was clearly, an HD era! I mean, even if every game came with a manditory install, Sony recongnized the risk of using inferior disk capacity for what was clearly to be a more (disc storage demanding) HD gaming experience; Just look at Mass Effect 2, L.A. Noire, FFXiii, Rage, as proof! To make matters worst, they couldn't even fit Dead Space 2's multiplayer on one disc and that games multiplayer had, how many modes??? And what's even more sad, they're now trying to work on a system update that'll give a 1gb boost to the already inferior disc capacity... I mean does MS honestly believe, this'll help future games fit on to one disc??? And let's not even get me started on 360's nonexistent HDD support capabilities; I mean, for a company that clearly shadows over the PC world, they obviousely lack the indulging sanction of media friendly, HDD-to-software, synction! PS3 was truely ment to be this generations, "every-man's console", but instead, was forced to be the step-child do to it's obviousely superiority over 360... It reminds me of the PS2 vs Xbox era when developers had to develop games on PS2 first before porting them to Xbox. I mean truefully, it's been said proven that games designed, planned, built, and developed from the ground-up on PS3 is impossible to port to 360; Just ask Hideo Kojima when he was asked about a possible port of MGS4 to 360...! Seriousely, could you imagine that game on 360? That game took up all 50gb of a dual/layered blu-ray disc; Not to mention, it worked in conjunction with the PS3 HDD... So all-n-all, MS fanboys... Stop the hate'n! Stop with the "how's PSN" side-talk! Stop with the "360 version is superior" with only a 0.01% graphics boost! Because in the end, 360 is only and will always be, "worthless"!!!
The problem lies not in a new disc format for the 360, but we need a new xbox that doesn't chew our disk and spit it back out......and sometimes it don't spit disks back outps3-theme
I'm still trying to figuare out of MS is actually dumb enough to belive that a 1gb increase would make it easier for developers to keep games on one disc... This is truely MS's last stands against what is already a rapidly growing interrest in true PS3 development!
[QUOTE="RecklessTortuga"]It's funny how MS fanboys are quick to defend their inferior console with it's inferior DVD 9 capacity, no HDD-to-game support and inferior 2 to 4 disc based games... It's no wonder crapbox has been given the benefit-of-the-doubt this gen and has been lead platform on almost every game... Cause developers would have to deal with huge road blocks like this... Lucky for us, Rockstar isn't that, stupid like most developers, trying to fit a superior game on inferior outdated media like the 360... Though, you can't really blame other developers... True "ground-up" PS3 development would be impossible to port!gamer-adam1
Hows PSN going?
When it's back up, a whole better than what you have to pay for since this is clearly your only defence...
Funny how this seems to be Xdroins only defence against what's obviousely a minor set back versus still having to pay for something that's free to the rest of the world and having to still pay more for DLC... I mean seriousely, how can you knuckle-heads honestly live with your selves knowing, you have to pay for money... MS points indeed! That's like paying someone $20 for $10's worth of change!
Log in to comment