RevanBITW's forum posts

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@Bieberfan147 said:

PC gaming is dying or close to dead already. There is no dedicated PC devs, all the devs ran to where the money is, consoles, mobile, or even changing their occupation altogether.

Compare to PC gaming from 2010-2015 to back in 2000-2005

Back in 2000-2005 or even 1990s-2007 or so you had games back to back in quality you could play every year, it kind of felt like the great games just kept coming and this without any mention of console games or ports, back then ports were kinda rare

Now we make such a HUGE deal out of 1 release a year or so it seems like and it's probably a port that we pray isn't shitty, forget about it being a good port, we are just okay that it can play beyond 30 fps.

I'm pretty sure piracy had a big part to do with this shift of all the devs switching to other platforms such as consoles or phones or even web browser games, I don't really blame them since they were getting up to 70% of what they should have made taken away from them by the people consuming their content

Even back then I used to agree with the, "that's not a lost sale, they weren't going to buy the game anyway" but now after seeing the aftermath and what PC gaming has become I can only imagine if all those people who really enjoyed a lot of those games they thought were so iconic or great actually had paid for those games, that the PC gaming industry would be a lot different than it is today.

Now we're left with 90% of the games that are being released today from indie devs that make these "interesting" games that hardly anyone plays, a bunch of online survival early access games that never becomes finished, and or mobas copying each other. That leaves the rest of the 10% of all current games coming out to, "Big major triple A games" that take maybe up to 2 years to come out after the console version and is probably not ported right

What happened to all the dedicated PC games that were a fresh breath of air into the genre they were in, instead of games just blatantly copying each other

I remember back in 2005 or 2006 or so I could play triple A games back to back without any sign of running out for those years

Now I just hope there's better games next year after being so let down "this year" and every new year is "this year"

EDIT: Also this FORUM alone used to be so much more fun back in those times 2000-2007, the PC section alone was the biggest community compared to all the other sub forums on gamespot, the PC section of news coverage or reviews had just as much or if not, more content than the console section.

Everyday on the gamespot PC forum there would be 3-4 new pages of new or "Hot" topics where as compared today, you see all the same topics for about 1-2 months long.

How is it dying? Not even close. There are plenty of PC exclusive devs. Or at least, devs that prioritizes the PC like CD Projekt Red. The only things that truly has changed is how we have a lot of indie games and a couple of AAA games coming out regularly. The in-between, midrange releases are about as rare as ever. And how devs seems comfortable with releasing unstable games since they can just patch it more easily than ever. But this only affects you if you can't handle not buying the game Day 1. Because of the newly installed refund policies on Steam and Origin, the consumer has a lot more power now.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

Fans wants to get the big names, they don't want the giant skinny european they never saw play who's going to need a couple years to develop his potential. Especially if you're a New York sports team fan.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@yokofox33 said:

@PSP107: He'll somehow get Dragic to take below max and possibly trade Chalmers to accommodate Wade. He's Pat motherfucking Riley. The Don. The Godfather. Man gets shit done.

Right, except, you know, that one time where he didnt manage to keep the best player in the world. lol

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@benny_boy98 said:

I want to upgrade to a pc so what do I need to get? And what is the best equipment. Can't stand consoles anymore the anti aliasing is so bad.

Anti aliasing is what makes you want to be on PC? lol First, at least give us the budget you have for this.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

Bill Russell has 11 rings, he's the greatest of all-time.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@Chutebox said:

Great, only baseball on until football starts. **** life. Think I'm just going to end it now

What are you talking about, the CFL season is about to start!

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@mdk12345: jordan lost 3 times in the first round, LeBron never lost in the first round. Jordan such a choker :D

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@Chutebox said:

@RevanBITW: Never dodged anything.

I've been arguing that LeBron carried a bunch of scrubs to the Finals back in 2007. Which Jordan or Kobe never did. Then, this year, he pushed the best team in the world with a bunch of scrubs. Which Jordan or Kobe never did either. And you're talking about how he had an easy road in the East this year...

????

What a waste of time this was.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@Chutebox said:
@RevanBITW said:
@Chutebox said:
@RevanBITW said:
@Chutebox said:
@RevanBITW said:

Because he was on Draymond Green once the Warriors decided they would go small. But Green had a lot of games where he wasn't confident in taking that shot for some reason. Anyway, the best player in the world lost to the best team in the world because he was stuck with D-leaguers. What else was he supposed to do? Jordan or Kobe wouldn't have won the championship either with these circumstances.

I agree his guards were not good offensively. But he had two big men that were doing extremely well. More than well, they were dominating the inside. How many second chances did they give the Cavs? I'm not saying this team was equal to Jordan's, but there were really good players still on the team.

Your definition of good is a group of guys that would be at the bottom of a bad eastern conference if Lebron wasn't there.

So you're going to tell me mos and tris only were good because of lebron? All those blocks, rebounds, and one on one baskets were lebron?

Hell, Warriors basically benched Bogut, a second team defensive Center, because he was getting dominated by them.

If Tristan and Mozgov are your 2 best players, you're finishing at the bottom of the eastern conference.

He had Irving and Love for a majority of the playoffs too AND faced a much easier road than anyone in the West.

Keep dodging my point.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@Chutebox said:
@RevanBITW said:
@Chutebox said:
@RevanBITW said:

Because he was on Draymond Green once the Warriors decided they would go small. But Green had a lot of games where he wasn't confident in taking that shot for some reason. Anyway, the best player in the world lost to the best team in the world because he was stuck with D-leaguers. What else was he supposed to do? Jordan or Kobe wouldn't have won the championship either with these circumstances.

I agree his guards were not good offensively. But he had two big men that were doing extremely well. More than well, they were dominating the inside. How many second chances did they give the Cavs? I'm not saying this team was equal to Jordan's, but there were really good players still on the team.

Your definition of good is a group of guys that would be at the bottom of a bad eastern conference if Lebron wasn't there.

So you're going to tell me mos and tris only were good because of lebron? All those blocks, rebounds, and one on one baskets were lebron?

Hell, Warriors basically benched Bogut, a second team defensive Center, because he was getting dominated by them.

If Tristan and Mozgov are your 2 best players, you're finishing at the bottom of the eastern conference.