RevanBITW's forum posts

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@Jd1680a said:

@RevanBITW said:

@Jd1680a said:

It makes me wonder if Reckoning was part of a plot to defraud someone, namely Rhode Island taxpayers. This was an effort for Kurt Schillings to fatten up his wallet and gave false hope it would succeed. Remember Rhode Island could lose up to $100 million on 38 studios, the question is where exactly did that money go to?

Reckoning did have a very limited character designs, weapon and armor sets. It was the kind of game they could have funded $3 million a year for three years on 40 people to complete.

You have no clue of what happened. First of all, 38 studios went bankrupt because of their MMO game that was never completed, not because of KoA. Secondly, Curt Schilling lost a bunch of money because of this, no way his plan was to get in so much legal trouble with the state of Rhode Island.

The governor says Reckoning had to sell 3 million copies to break even, that would mean the game had cost around $60 million to make. Of a game that could have cost $15 million to make, there is something wrong with the picture. It might not have been Kurt, but someone else who was using this to get rich.

No triple A game can only cost 15 millions to produce nowadays.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@Jd1680a said:

It makes me wonder if Reckoning was part of a plot to defraud someone, namely Rhode Island taxpayers. This was an effort for Kurt Schillings to fatten up his wallet and gave false hope it would succeed. Remember Rhode Island could lose up to $100 million on 38 studios, the question is where exactly did that money go to?

Reckoning did have a very limited character designs, weapon and armor sets. It was the kind of game they could have funded $3 million a year for three years on 40 people to complete.

You have no clue of what happened. First of all, 38 studios went bankrupt because of their MMO game that was never completed, not because of KoA. Secondly, Curt Schilling lost a bunch of money because of this, no way his plan was to get in so much legal trouble with the state of Rhode Island.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

The 660 can still carry you fine until the 800 series comes out.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@PSP107 said:

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

PSP once again dropping dat knowledge.

Revan made it easy.

What knowledge? I'm thinking he's being sarcastic. lol

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

Next time use your fucking head.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@PSP107 said:

@RevanBITW said:

@PSP107 said:

@RevanBITW said:

@PSP107 said:

@Boston_Boyy said:

@PSP107 said:

@sherman-tank1 said:

Good deal by the Bears. They have too many holes on defense to draft a QB and their offense is stacked. Why waste Marshall in his prime developing a QB?

His prime would be wasted if they no have no defense. McCown should be of been the starter while developing a QB. That money on Cutler could of been used elsewhere.

Should they really feel comfortable going all in on McCown though? If he were able to make a career as a starter it'd be pretty unprecedented. He's going to be 35 before next year and had never posted a passer rating above 75 before one, less than a half season hot stretch last year. There may be another team in the league who could use him, but Bears are too good and have too many offensive weapons for me to honestly believe the Bears should feel alright trusting him.

Should Bears fans be comfortable with an injury prone QB? 35 is not old for a QB. Have you seen McCown scrambling for 1st downs. If not mistaken, McCown doesn't have a lot of mileage nor Injuries.

Because he's nothing special. Anyone can lob it to Jeffery or Marshall and look good.

So why pay Cutler $50 guaranteed if anybody can do that? If anybody can do that why not draft a QB?

Because Cutler is better.

lol, you just said anybody can do it.

I said anybody can lob it to Jeffery and Marshall and look good. That doesn't mean that's all there is to it to be a QB for Bears.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@PSP107 said:

@RevanBITW said:

@PSP107 said:

@Boston_Boyy said:

@PSP107 said:

@sherman-tank1 said:

Good deal by the Bears. They have too many holes on defense to draft a QB and their offense is stacked. Why waste Marshall in his prime developing a QB?

His prime would be wasted if they no have no defense. McCown should be of been the starter while developing a QB. That money on Cutler could of been used elsewhere.

Should they really feel comfortable going all in on McCown though? If he were able to make a career as a starter it'd be pretty unprecedented. He's going to be 35 before next year and had never posted a passer rating above 75 before one, less than a half season hot stretch last year. There may be another team in the league who could use him, but Bears are too good and have too many offensive weapons for me to honestly believe the Bears should feel alright trusting him.

Should Bears fans be comfortable with an injury prone QB? 35 is not old for a QB. Have you seen McCown scrambling for 1st downs. If not mistaken, McCown doesn't have a lot of mileage nor Injuries.

Because he's nothing special. Anyone can lob it to Jeffery or Marshall and look good.

So why pay Cutler $50 guaranteed if anybody can do that? If anybody can do that why not draft a QB?

Because Cutler is better.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@PSP107 said:

@Boston_Boyy said:

@PSP107 said:

@sherman-tank1 said:

Good deal by the Bears. They have too many holes on defense to draft a QB and their offense is stacked. Why waste Marshall in his prime developing a QB?

His prime would be wasted if they no have no defense. McCown should be of been the starter while developing a QB. That money on Cutler could of been used elsewhere.

Should they really feel comfortable going all in on McCown though? If he were able to make a career as a starter it'd be pretty unprecedented. He's going to be 35 before next year and had never posted a passer rating above 75 before one, less than a half season hot stretch last year. There may be another team in the league who could use him, but Bears are too good and have too many offensive weapons for me to honestly believe the Bears should feel alright trusting him.

Should Bears fans be comfortable with an injury prone QB? 35 is not old for a QB. Have you seen McCown scrambling for 1st downs. If not mistaken, McCown doesn't have a lot of mileage nor Injuries.

McCown has been riding the wave of the best WR duo in the NFL. McCown was nobody before this season, why? Because he's nothing special. Anyone can lob it to Jeffery or Marshall and look good.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

@airshocker said:

Only use watercooling if you plan on overclocking. I'm running a 4.6ghz overclock on my I5-2500k using a Corsair H60.

What? Air cooling can get the job done too, it just won't be as good. For example my i5-3570k is overclocked at 4.5 Ghz with very good temps and I'm cooling it with a Hyper Evo 212.

Avatar image for RevanBITW
RevanBITW

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By RevanBITW
Member since 2013 • 739 Posts

what