[QUOTE="SpinoRaptor24"]He just goes after any 360 games. I do not care but just saying he can not be taken serious when he talks about anything 360. I played Mass Effect and Mass Effect 2 on the PC , it has nothing to do with the 360. And did you guys know.....Alan Wake rated teen http://kotaku.com/5467161/alan-wake-slated-for-may-18-looks-good Why would they do that. I just saw a guy getting axed in the gameplay video and it's rated teen? You can have mature story without gore, but common...The game looks fine.
I think you're the one being "hyperbolic".
SilentlyMad
Revan_911's forum posts
I noticed them just from the screnshoot. The three branches look like cardboard.[QUOTE="Revan_911"]
[QUOTE="MC3887"]
The thing is is that you probably would not notice it unless you are right in front of the tree.. Also, thousands of tree's means no extra stlye/detail.
MC3887
That, is what I mean... If you are playing you won't notice. The camera is pretty much right in front of it.... Look at the gameplay vids..they don't look like that screen cuz you won't notice them easily.
Ok, man but that's not really an excuse. Not every exclusive is the next graphics king, when are people gonna realize that.Cute. And no it doesn't look better than KZ2.. Best shooter to date. biggest game of 2010.
Revolution316
[QUOTE="Zensword"]
Yeah the branches are not great but I dont think they're crappy either. Overall this screens looks great.
MC3887
The thing is is that you probably would not notice it unless you are right in front of the tree.. Also, thousands of tree's means no extra stlye/detail.
I noticed them just from the screnshoot. The three branches look like cardboard.there is a big difference between the best looking game ever made and being crappy. you are the one being hyperbolic.MethodManFTWHe just compared it to crysis. I never said the game looked crapy, i pointed out some things that look crappy. I'm not hyperbolic, the strength of this game is not in graphics its in artistic design and atmosphere.
[QUOTE="windsquid9000"]
Low-res textures, little to no normal mapping, and low-poly objects/environments... :(
I am disappoint.
Zensword
I know you're being sarcastic. I'm a cow but I have to admit that this screenshot looks amazing, it's like a photo!
Dear God, look at the grass, the dirt, the trees, the lignting, shadow ... Now we can make threads compare the graphics ofAW with Crysis.
Stop being so hyperbolic. Just look at the tree branches, the far away building the car they all look crappy. I don't know why every exclusive ever made has to be graphics king, i just don't.wow... im hoping the 'Alan Wake is only 8+ hours long' source is not credible, or something... That would be a bummer.MethodManFTWIt's an interview with a german site. It's credible. And it's just five moths old. I don't know if you expect Remedy to add another ten hours when no one is looking. But Max Payne 2 was not longer and it's one of the best games ever made. So don't be so bummed.
This is one of the worst sticky ever.... It just shows an FAQ with some pretty outaded answers...
Just in Alan Wake to be 8-10 hours....
http://translate.google.fi/translate?prev=hp&hl=fi&js=y&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hardgame2.com%2Fwww%2Fnoticia-48271.html&sl=auto&tl=en&history_state0=
And this also
Alan Wake developer Remedy has revealed the success of the game is crucial to the survival of the company
http://www.incgamers.com/News/21067/remedy-betting-the-farm-on-alan-wake
[QUOTE="navyguy21"]
[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]
Seems people have a hard time following this, its an old interview.
MC3887
Ok, Judge for yourself then :P
@ raven watch this.
Was i supposed to be impressed? It does look cool, but where in the video do they even hint that the game is open world. All i saw were some extremely linear sequences.
Log in to comment