RobNBanks' forum posts

Avatar image for RobNBanks
RobNBanks

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 RobNBanks
Member since 2009 • 74 Posts

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="krazy-blazer"] Have you ever played a game with more then 100 players?Cait__Sith
Yes, but that does not make the game better honestly.

If done right it can. Take BF2 for example 64 players was a lot back in 2005 for a game as complex as BF2. But like I said if done right, which is not what I've heard about MAG.

It's not the number of players that holds MAG back. It's the underwhelming gameplay.

Unless they work on balancing and fix up some minor issues, this game could be great. Worth paying $60 for? Hell no. Now PS3 fanboy should be allowed to list this game as part of their 2010 lineup. After all the bashing of ODST for being an overpriced expansion, MAG is so much worse. $60 for a multiplayer only game? It'll be dead when Zipper's next game comes out, and if it's SOCOM 4 as rumored, MAG would be useless.

Avatar image for RobNBanks
RobNBanks

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 RobNBanks
Member since 2009 • 74 Posts

[QUOTE="RobNBanks"]

[QUOTE="urdead18"]

Modern Warfare 2 is MUCH more deserving of a proper sequel status than Left 4 Dead 2.

Seriously. 70+ New guns, Spec Ops, New Campaign, new texture streaming, 20+ new multiplayer maps, new perks, Emblems and Titles, Killstreaks...

Where as L4D2 brought melee weapons, some new campaigns and a few new guns.

So yeah, I can't wait for Call of Duty 7 or whatever they call it because I know it'll be a great multiplayer game that I'll play with my friends after enjoying the single player.

urdead18

What? There isn't even half the guns you stated (70), Spec Ops is terrible and a joke. Easily beatable in under 5 hours. There aren't 20 new multiplayer maps, and they're all terrible. How is perks a good thing? Because it further casualizes gameplay? Emblems and Titles are useless and killstreaks did nothing but make the game worse than it already was.

Call it what you want, I call it fun. Also, I really enjoy games like Demon's Souls. Call me casual, call me hardcore. I don't care.

Ok..so you like Demon's Souls and I'm supposed to be impressed?

It's funny how you didn't even counter anything I said. All you did was make up fake numbers to make a terrible game look good.

Liek omg l4d2 added 9001 guns! and 400 new multiplayer maps and scavenge mode with new infected...

Avatar image for RobNBanks
RobNBanks

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 RobNBanks
Member since 2009 • 74 Posts

I agree.

I've just given up on Xbox, the games are great and Halo will always be the best FPS on consoles, but I won't be buying another 360 and won't buy the next Xbox unless it's reliable. It's scratched my discs too many times.

Avatar image for RobNBanks
RobNBanks

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 RobNBanks
Member since 2009 • 74 Posts

Modern Warfare 2 is MUCH more deserving of a proper sequel status than Left 4 Dead 2.

Seriously. 70+ New guns, Spec Ops, New Campaign, new texture streaming, 20+ new multiplayer maps, new perks, Emblems and Titles, Killstreaks...

Where as L4D2 brought melee weapons, some new campaigns and a few new guns.

So yeah, I can't wait for Call of Duty 7 or whatever they call it because I know it'll be a great multiplayer game that I'll play with my friends after enjoying the single player.

urdead18

What? There isn't even half the guns you stated (70), Spec Ops is terrible and a joke. Easily beatable in under 5 hours. There aren't 20 new multiplayer maps, and they're all terrible. How is perks a good thing? Because it further casualizes gameplay? Emblems and Titles are useless and killstreaks did nothing but make the game worse than it already was.

Avatar image for RobNBanks
RobNBanks

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 RobNBanks
Member since 2009 • 74 Posts

Infinite ammo rooms or no buy, that's my stance.

Avatar image for RobNBanks
RobNBanks

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 RobNBanks
Member since 2009 • 74 Posts

[QUOTE="Dark5tar1"]

[QUOTE="jamiebernard"] I agree I hate modersMarcRecon

Modders are such noobs they cant win so they have to be wusses about it, usually these or modded controllers.

Agreed, it takes away the satisfaction of a true victory.

True victory in what..a meaningless Xbox match?

I'm not a modder/cheater nor do I condone it, but really? All you guys talk about this honor in winning a match online. Who the hell cares..honestly?

If you're not playing for money, then it doesn't matter. It's all meaningless BS to pass time.

Avatar image for RobNBanks
RobNBanks

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 RobNBanks
Member since 2009 • 74 Posts

I can't believe people are buying this :lol:

_TheJoker_

This.

Shows how intelligent some people are..

Avatar image for RobNBanks
RobNBanks

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 RobNBanks
Member since 2009 • 74 Posts

[QUOTE="RobNBanks"]

It's caused by a mod and it's great.

This game is actually fun. I haven't a played a game this long in such a short time since SOCOM 2.

Hoping IW doesn't patch it, their game isn't even fun the way they made it. It's just camp simulator.

Dark5tar1

You're pathetic you cheater, have you heard of skills? you should try it when you play one of the best games this year

Uh yeah, I actually played games that take skill competitively.

COD is not competitive, nor does it require skill.

It's not even close to being one of the best games this year, and it's probably better off now than it is the way IW had it because it was so broken. Full of unbalanced weapons, terrible gametypes and the worst maps ever put into a game.

I'm not the one who modded it so why you're calling me pathetic and assuming I have no skills is cute. Wanna play me in some Quake, Counter Strike, StarCraft? (never played it competitively but it's a skill requiring game)

You name it, and if it takes skill, I'll gladly play you and destroy you. If not, then stfu and go back to playing your terrible, broken games that need a mod to make it playable.

Avatar image for RobNBanks
RobNBanks

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 RobNBanks
Member since 2009 • 74 Posts

It's caused by a mod and it's great.

This game is actually fun. I haven't a played a game this long in such a short time since SOCOM 2.

Hoping IW doesn't patch it, their game isn't even fun the way they made it. It's just camp simulator.

Avatar image for RobNBanks
RobNBanks

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 RobNBanks
Member since 2009 • 74 Posts

Gunplay in Halo 3 is awesome, no guns are drastically overpowered/unpowered and any gun is useful if you know how to use it and know when to.

Vesica_Prime

This.

But then again, now that you mention it, TC has a point. It is outdated.

I mean, who the hell actually creates balanced games now? Pfft, where about to be in the year 2010 Bungie, get out of early 00's!

(sarcasm btw for the slow ones)