[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="krazy-blazer"] Have you ever played a game with more then 100 players?Cait__SithYes, but that does not make the game better honestly. If done right it can. Take BF2 for example 64 players was a lot back in 2005 for a game as complex as BF2. But like I said if done right, which is not what I've heard about MAG.
It's not the number of players that holds MAG back. It's the underwhelming gameplay.
Unless they work on balancing and fix up some minor issues, this game could be great. Worth paying $60 for? Hell no. Now PS3 fanboy should be allowed to list this game as part of their 2010 lineup. After all the bashing of ODST for being an overpriced expansion, MAG is so much worse. $60 for a multiplayer only game? It'll be dead when Zipper's next game comes out, and if it's SOCOM 4 as rumored, MAG would be useless.
Log in to comment