@Ewan "But the fact of the matter it isn't that same as pedophilia." And I didn't say it was. Stop with the strawmans. One sets precedent for the other. That's all I've pointed out.
Hehe. You know you've hit a cord of desperation when you've got people pulling the "closeted" card as a form of defense. And of course, regardless of the fact that other people have spent time arguing the topic as I have, the inverse cannot be true. "Joins us! Join us!!" HAHAHAHAHA!!! As I already told MacBeth, I've been apart of that lifestyle already. I'm not interested in going back. @Cutmasterfrost "and now your hating on gingers" What? I said they had skin conditions--which is true. Gingers tend to have pigmentation problems that make it hazardous to be out in the sun. I'm sure you're aware of this. I'm sorry if its hurts your feelings to point that out, but it's the truth. ....Okay, correction: I have no problem stating the truth regardless of people's feelings. So I'm not really sorry. "wish you'd stop using the word sodomy, it's anal intercourse or sex, not sodomy," But it's not actually sex. Why on earth would I refer to it in such a way simply to make you happy when that defies common sense? Sex can be conjugal, bu that only serves an overall procreative purpose. "you're only standing point is the bible," I haven't mentioned the Bible once. "i keep saying your a homophobic fool! why are you still not banned for this blatant homophobia GAMESPOT do something" Haha! This is the typical mentality of homosexuals: your morality does not agree with my own and therefore you must be punished for it. I haven't insulted you, I haven't referred to you using any derogatory language, and I haven't threatened you. What warrant is there to ban me beyond the fact that you disagree with me. Now I, on the other hand, have been on the receiving end of insults, derogatory language, and threats. Why have you chosen to ignore this I wonder...
@famekiller "Well ain't gays classed as a minority? same thing" Again: you miss the point of me mentioning homosexuality as a disorder. It had nothing to do with the minority status of homosexuals. "And i never mentioned sodomy or its practice. I merely said 2 guys having sex. Ever heard of oral sex?" Sodomy is essentially any alternative act to sex used to achieve climax with or without another person. Phrases like "anal sex" and "oral sex" originated from popular culture. Not a real identification of "sex." And just because a straight couple decides to participate in sodomy, that doesn't mean homosexuals should feel empowered to do so. It's a an unhealthy act regardless of who does it. It should be noted however, that homosexuals are the largest enablers of the practice for want of an actual means by which to copulate.
@famekiller "I suppose red heads are a disorder as well? And left handers.?" Uh....No. I didn't say that being in a minority was a disorder. I said that having an attraction to a form that's incompatible to your own anatomy is a disorder. Although, I will concede that gingers tend to have pretty bad skin conditions. "2 guys having sex isn't meant to be a form of reproducing. It's basically the same as masterbating to put it blunt." Which is the point. No one--with the exception of you--has brought up the issue of sodomy or its practice. The point here has been an emphasis on the fact that an attraction to someone of the same sex defeats the purpose of being able to copulate at all. If you are physically unable of having sex with the person you're attracted to due to the fact you're sexual organs are simply incompatible, then you are confused.
@famekiller One doesn't have to be an expert on homosexuality to properly identify its nature as a disorder since--after all--we have the anatomy of our own bodies to look at as a frame of reference. Two people of the same sex being attracted to each other equates to a disorder. Two people of the opposite sex being attracted to each other equates to normality. To teach or imply any differently in a public forum (see also: public school, movies, video games, MBs) is culturally damaging.
@Aiwatan There doesn't need to be a similarity in severity between the two acts to apply the same principle of excusing/endorsing the behavior of anyone who feels they're genetically predisposed to said behavior. Homosexuals say they're born to be the way they are, and therefore the state should endorse their behavior and recognize it as normal/healthy. Zoophiles, pedophiles, polygamists, etc. have the exact same tune. As such, the precedent established by homosexuals is now accessible to them as well.
Ryouga001's comments