I see the fallacious comments go to a new high here. Mental Handicaps? Okay, I'm supposedly mentally impaired because I told you. I never said crap about my mental state, and you're not one to say anything seeing as you don't know me personally, and therefore cannot prove whether I am handicapped or not. But that's not the point. Let me tell you now I was born without any issues (thank the lord), and that sometimes, to get a point across to someone, you have to lie. Just think here. I hate George Bush with a passion. Why? Well, in order to get the point by that Iraq was dangerous, he blurted out false statements, such as, "The Iraqis have weapons of mass destruction." Weapons we're yet to see. Plain and simple, sometimes you have to lie to get a point by. However, there is a large difference between lieing (sp?) and making false remarks about things you don't know. Benefit of the doubt or not, what he said was completely idiotic, and so was what you said. I actually respected you for not falling for my "little evil hidden survey" but now I completely regret the praise I just gave to you. Also, may I mention right now that there's a difference between what Bush and I did. Bush wanted to gain more votes and have every American against the Iraqis. He lied for his own personal gain. I lied to learn more of the internet, so during future events, not only could I tell if someone was lieing, but I'd be able to tell someone else that they're falling for a trick. I lied for the world. lol. But in all seriousness, there's a large difference between my actions, bush's actions, your (valmonte) actions, and SDHcrusader's actions. Well, you and SDH are pretty much the same making completely false, and unsupported remarks about me. I say unsupported because NOT ONCE did you prove I was mental, or 13, or even a damn hacker. The only thing you guys could prove was that I lied about the memory stick. But wait! You proved that because it was FACT. I actually did lie. But I'm not mental, a hacker, 13, and I wasn't "picking on" 13 year old kids. I was instead trying to see how quickly and desperately a human can believe one's comments. I'm suprised that Valmonte didn't bring anything better to the table. I know you're smart. Pick up the game man.
On a sidenote, if Valmonte wasn't dissing me, but instead actually praising me for picking on kids, well then, that's your opinion. Praise is always good, but my goal wasn't to piss of kids. And it's hard to tell if you're being nice or an ass. You state that I'm handicapped, yet you praise me for supposedly picking on kids. WTF?
High_Spy
Who cares? Go outside and try playing a sport. You are23 and arguing with children on a game forum. Your attempt to be itelligent failed. Think of a different word besides fallacious, maybe illogical. Ever hear of a thesaurus, give it a try. As to you being smarter than me, ha good luck winning that argument. What was your SAT/ACT in high school, what college did you attend, what was your degree? I got a 32 on the ACT and a full ride to a nationally credited engineering college. I'm 19 and hold an easy 4.0.
You act like you were trying to do a study and "research" by people's reactions. Are you writing a paper on your findings of children reacting to you "hacking" memory sticks? Have fun doing your research, you look like a fool.
Way to school me by the way, I'm humbled by your superior intelligence.
That's sarcasm, since you like to point out the obvious to me I thought I'd give ita try for you.
Good luck in your sad pathetic life.
Log in to comment