Likewise, I support this but I also suggest that since there are alot of fanboyish, spamming reviewers with 100 word "aaaaaaaaaa this game is great aaaaaaaaa..." reviews, we should allocate a small section for top reviewers of all games.
I'm not talking about the game generally but my Graphics Card which I beleieve is fairly standard and good enough for medium settings on today's games is playing Mass Effect horribly despite the fact I'm putting it on high settings. Am I missing something or is my GTS 250 generally just sh*t?
In the end, all gamers will go towards the console which they find has the best gaming opportunities head of them and thus I go for poll number 5. It is highly likely that both systems would have the same graphical/hardware capabilities, as Blu-Ray is "now" and I don't see Sony moving ahead anytime soon while Microsoft on the other hand, can't afford to stay behind in the next-gen race with standard DVD's.
Right I'm going to admit that before this thread, I wasn't at all hyped for GoW3. Now since I saw that second GoW animation, I am completely sold. Call me a fanboy but in terms of overall quality, GoW3 will take home the trophy this year. Obviously it's kinda' hard to tell becaue there are some titles to be released this year that have been kept incredibly tight-lipped in terms of visuals that few people around the System War's are actually talking about. Dead Space 2 or New Vegas for example could be potential surprises.
I just picked up a PS3 -- been playing through the demos available, so far I can't find a single game that really blows me away, (different topic for a different thread), but I was surprised how undewhelmed I was by the Killzone 2 demo. Granted, it's just a demo, but as far as graphics king of shooters, I don't know. Honestly, the shooting in ME2 felt more satisfying and looked better, and that's an RPG. None of the combat had that "satisfying" feel of a good shooter, all the enemies looked the same, and the whole tone just felt like a Gears rip-off.
Am I missing something? The graphics seemed above average, nothing mind-blowing.
grongo2
Possibly not, I mean I realize that some people plain hated Killzone 2 (360 Fanboys aside) and there are some who are still using that damn Bazooka to this very day. The shooting took a much more deliberate approach, akin to Bad Company while holding to margin of around 30fps compared to the 60 of Modern Warfare. Personally, I loved it, but it really depends on what type of shooters you cater for. So don't feel like it's only you who hated it, I know of many others too.
Dude, I was in the same boat as you at one point. Trust me, it's completely safe. This is Sony we are talking about. A globally known company. They're not going to just suddenly pick you out of 1 million Sony customers across MP3 Players and Vaio Laptops, and then just decide "hey, let's take that guys credit card number." Online shopping generally can be a bit of a issue because unless you use PayPal then you are a bit on the unsafe side however, this is a PSN Store. It's incredibly easy, simple and reliable to use. Either that, or you could just buy gift cards but really, you needn't bother.
[QUOTE="ihtesam19"]Well hopefully I will get a Nintendo DSi mainly for pokemon, and I played Emerald with my Game Boy Advance SP and its super fun :D But now I don't know which game to buy Platinum Or HS/SS and does HH/SS have better graphics? I would like to play online too lol (wifi) I'd get both as they are both just as addictive. Pokemon Heart Gold and Soul Silver are obviously going to be better in terms of additions and overall feel but that's far from the point. You'll definitely spend a good 100 or so hours on Platinum and maybe even more on Heart Gold / Soul Silver, especially when considering those were the games that included a second region that the other pokemon games sorely lacked.
Log in to comment