Probably Xbox 360. I would get it on the PC but I find two issues. The first being my friends all have Xbox 360's. The second being that it is a console shooter first and formost. It was built to play with a controller.
Wasdie
I read a thread here the other day reporting how the PC version felt much more like a BattlleField game.
I didn't get that feeling, yet the beta had a lot of bugs and I didn't play long.
I'd get it for PS3 even if for the fact the PC version has a 32 player capacity rather than 24 but that's because I've always been a true console player.
LMAO at everyone that said MAG, what an epic fail. MW2 is blatantly better, if someone says otherwise, they have a very bad taste in games
muller39
Stop saying MAG is bad. It is bad in your opinion but your opinion isnt the end all be all. Start respecting others opinions or your wont be taken seriously at all. I second that. I really liked MAG and I find it disrespectful for people to call it an epic fail when many players really liked it. At least it doesn't have the connection issues that Modern Warfare 2 had and it trys to embark on something really new, something MW2 didn't do.
Zerg... I mean its even a common word used in games beside starcraft now days "oh noes they are zergining me" :P
KalDurenik
Protoss for me. I like Zerg but they take a lot of micromanaging to be good. At least compared to the other races.zomglolcats
Agreed, I love their art direction and playing $tyle but I'm usually a slow point and clicker when it comes to RTS's so I tend to stray away from the races that involve micromanaging such as why I love the Protoss. I dislike the Terrans simply because they're too similar to many other RTS Races in different franchises.
I like the Terrans; they're pretty well rounded, but personally, I like to experiment with more exotic choices such as coming from the Protoss and Zergs.
A 9.6 at Gamespot is a 10, seeing as they round up. I wonder how GS will rate it.
Twin-Blade
First of IGN are alot more lenient with their scores and rounding up a score of a 9.6 would be a 9.5. Anyway even if that was the case, they wouldn't simply round the score up/down, they'd consider both sides of the argument. Remember - a 10 in GS's books = perfect and a game that cannot be improved upon in any meaningful way.
Personally, I like to play as the Protoss more with their distinct aim for quality over quantity, though I do also like the bold art $tyle of the Zergs.
Log in to comment