Sephiroth228's forum posts

Avatar image for Sephiroth228
Sephiroth228

1109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

50

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 Sephiroth228
Member since 2006 • 1109 Posts
[QUOTE="3picuri3"][QUOTE="ghaleon0721"][QUOTE="3picuri3"]

[QUOTE="ghaleon0721"][QUOTE="Hulabaloza"]Look at the chart......the PS3 sold 127k last month with many units on shelves.....the 360 sold 160k in Feb 06 AND it was sold out everywhere. Right now the PS3 has sold about 40k more overall (out of 1.1 million) than the 360 at the same point......a difference that wouldn't be there if Microsoft didn't have supply problems. Wait till next month. It's clear the PS3 is on a downward trend....127k is pathetic 4 months into a launch. The hype is dying and people just won't pay $600 for a PS3. Sony needs to do something fast, cause the PS3 collapse is happening.ghaleon0721

Um, excuse me but what games came out for the PS3 in February? Uhhhh, none really. So fine, let's "wait until next month" when we see the effects of Motorstorm, virtua fighter 5, armored core 4 and oblivion. YOu act like its some great feat for the 360 to be outselling the PS3 right now when they have about five times as many games out. The fact is on a LEVEL playing field the PS3 is selling faster. You can't deny it. The charts are right there for you. And enough about the "supply problems" just because Sony learned their lesson from the PS2 launch doesn't mean that Microsoft gets a pass.

 

we can all deny it -- your using a totally flawed site to prove your point, doesn't matter that the fanbois in SW voted it the official source, it's still bunk.

 

just you wait until the stories start popping up about how pathetic the launch was -- then you can try to argue for the console.

So if vgcharts is wrong, do you propose a better source? OTherwise, shut up. You can't just point at something and say its wrong when you know NOTHING about it. NOR can you point out WHY its wrong. and on top of that, you can't point to ANYTHING else. So shut up

 

oooo - told me to shut up twice. big man. might have to pass this one on to the mods seeing you can't articulate your thoughts without lashing out at others.

 

i'll let you believe what you want to - i'm not going to lead you by the hand through the internets to show you what you should be perfectly capable of finding yourself.  

So you're saying that you REFUSE to produce evidence to support your argument? Great debate tactic.

lol! owned
Avatar image for Sephiroth228
Sephiroth228

1109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

50

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 Sephiroth228
Member since 2006 • 1109 Posts

[QUOTE="G-Legend"]I think Sony should snatch up WoW :lol: (99.9% chance of that NOT happening).Xanog1

It could, Blizzard seems intent on milking the game for all it is worth.

That way, they can go back to saying "But, we had to work on WoW" whenever anyone in the world calls them stupid for not making StarcCraft 2 and Diablo 3.

:D love your sig xanog lol. Down with THE MAN
Avatar image for Sephiroth228
Sephiroth228

1109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

50

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 Sephiroth228
Member since 2006 • 1109 Posts

I think the clan meetings and stuff related eith home will be excellent. It creates a place for clan memebrs to actually meet at the clan leaders apartment, creating a greater sense of closeness within the clan. This of course leads to ONLINE DOMINATION.

I can see someone "important" having a huge apartment and hiring a bouncer for it or something lol. That would be awesome. The possibilites are really huge.

Avatar image for Sephiroth228
Sephiroth228

1109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

50

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 Sephiroth228
Member since 2006 • 1109 Posts

meh lbp=garry's mod

lol j/k yeah it does look cool, but i'm more impressed with Home.

Avatar image for Sephiroth228
Sephiroth228

1109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

50

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 Sephiroth228
Member since 2006 • 1109 Posts
[QUOTE="Sephiroth228"][QUOTE="darkhero2k"]You are a troll for not reading something and yet responding to it. Not one person here has made ANY point contrary to what I have written. I stand by my thread.darkhero2k
i'll make a mature post. The Home application for the ps3 is better in almost every way than the existing praised Xbox live application, and is better than the online functionality that the wii DOESN'T HAVE because Nintendo hasn't decided to release it yet. And saying that the wii outselling the Ps3 is a valid argument is liek saying that because Ferrari's are better than Chevrolet's, they should sell more. This is not the case, however because Ferraris are much more expensive that high end Chevrolet cars such as the Corvette. face it. You really are saying nothing.

Hello, I will reply to your post You have failed to realize that the PS3 is already dying. The "home" application will not save it, the lack of users will soon cripple any functionality it has. The Wii is doing fine even without one, and the XBox360 has a thriving online community. The PS3 may be more expensive than the Wii, but you are forgetting that a console is not a car, and abysmal sales DO mean it's dying.

The fact that Home is a free, easy access, innovative application assures that it will not have a lack of users. I am willing to say that statistically compared with MMO's and Xbox Live, at least 2/3 of people with an online capable ps3 will use Home. Even if not one person bought a ps3 from now on, you're looking at close to 750,000 users, even if they are only casual users.
Avatar image for Sephiroth228
Sephiroth228

1109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

50

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 Sephiroth228
Member since 2006 • 1109 Posts
[QUOTE="darkhero2k"]You are a troll for not reading something and yet responding to it. Not one person here has made ANY point contrary to what I have written. I stand by my thread.Sephiroth228
i'll make a mature post. The Home application for the ps3 is better in almost every way than the existing praised Xbox live application, and is better than the online functionality that the wii DOESN'T HAVE because Nintendo hasn't decided to release it yet. And saying that the wii outselling the Ps3 is a valid argument is liek saying that because Ferrari's are better than Chevrolet's, they should sell more. This is not the case, however because Ferraris are much more expensive that high end Chevrolet cars such as the Corvette. face it. You really are saying nothing.

you still haven't responded to my post..even though it is a rather mature comment geared towards conflicting with your preexisting opinion on the subject matter.
Avatar image for Sephiroth228
Sephiroth228

1109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

50

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 Sephiroth228
Member since 2006 • 1109 Posts

Hmmm, at least you could have set the paragraphs properly after such an obvious COPY AND PASTE job. The PS3 has just barely even been born, so to say that it is "dying" only 4 months after it's initial launch is so so laughably premature that I do not know whether to laugh, cry....or both.:lol::cry:

The PS3 has more latent potential than any console yet made, and to deny so, is to deny the facts and only serves to prove that you have no clue what you are talking about. You just created a troll account, only to come in here and PASTE some derogatory remarks about a GAME CONSOLE for crying out loud, lol. If that is not sad, I do not know what is. 

In summary, if you do not like the PS3....fine, so be it. You do not, however, have to come into a PS3 forum and childishly post blatant flame bait that is based off of the disease of your narrow, immature, ill-informed, closed minded, FAN BOY opinion. Like whatever you choose to like, and have respect and tolerance of others while they do the same.

Have a nice day. 

ironcreed
nice
Avatar image for Sephiroth228
Sephiroth228

1109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

50

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 Sephiroth228
Member since 2006 • 1109 Posts
You are a troll for not reading something and yet responding to it. Not one person here has made ANY point contrary to what I have written. I stand by my thread.darkhero2k
i'll make a mature post. The Home application for the ps3 is better in almost every way than the existing praised Xbox live application, and is better than the online functionality that the wii DOESN'T HAVE because Nintendo hasn't decided to release it yet. And saying that the wii outselling the Ps3 is a valid argument is liek saying that because Ferrari's are better than Chevrolet's, they should sell more. This is not the case, however because Ferraris are much more expensive that high end Chevrolet cars such as the Corvette. face it. You really are saying nothing.
Avatar image for Sephiroth228
Sephiroth228

1109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

50

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#9 Sephiroth228
Member since 2006 • 1109 Posts

The ham sandwich theorem takes its name from the case when n = 3 and the three objects of any shape are a chunk of ham and two chunks of bread — notionally, a sandwich — which can then each be bisected with a single cut (i.e., a plane). In two dimensions, the theorem is known as the pancake theorem of having to cut two infinitesimally thin pancakes on a plate each in half with a single cut (i.e., a straight line).

The ham sandwich theorem is also sometimes referred to as the "ham and cheese sandwich theorem", again referring to the special case when n = 3 and the three objects are

  1. a chunk of ham,
  2. a slice of cheese, and
  3. two slices of bread (treated as a single disconnected object).
Avatar image for Sephiroth228
Sephiroth228

1109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

50

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 Sephiroth228
Member since 2006 • 1109 Posts
[QUOTE="gayguy"]Troll!darkhero2k
Hello, Mr. "gayguy", how ironic it is I am being called a troll by someone named "gayguy". Please take time to review my article and point out any misconceptions. I think sometimes when a controversial opinion is presented as this, we assume it is a troll without reading and realizing the facts.

By saying this are you being anti-gay? are you saying that all gay people are trolls? that paragraph just confused me...