@slimskelter now that I think about it, everything you just said, makes perfect sense and it is very well explained, so I guess that it is true, macs are a bit overpriced, at least for the quality, I guess i'm just gonna back down now..
@slimskelter maybe you did not understand, I did not say that a mac is better than a PC, so i guess now that i have explained, that brings me to my previous point, which makes us forget at least half of your comment, what i said was that macs are not overpriced, i would not like a mac in my hands, because i'm a gamer, and anyone with more than half a brain knows that if you want to get into intense gaming, a mac would NOT be the smartest idea. i guess macs just are not for people like us, I personally prefer a good windows PC over any mac, but just give apple a rest...
@KoAxBIGxBOSSx nah dude, i have always been a pc user, but have been looking into why people say that macs are overpriced, what im saying is that maybe people should give it a rest, and i would not really get a mac for gaming, and not to be rude but, microsoft is not a software company, at least not only a software company... and i dont doubt you can play games on high graphics, but i dont think it "outperforms" than "your friends mac"
@slimskelter @KevinJKoren ok, I am a PC user, but give it a rest with the "apple's products are overpriced" first of all, it's not the brand, any computer, if it's expensive, it's because it's better than a cheap computer, you could get any mac with bad hardware and get away with just paying 100 - 300 dollars, the reason why people say it is overpriced is because every time someone gets into Apple.com the first thing you see is a $2500 computer, but what do you expect them to have on the home page? a 1982 apple computer? another reason is that they discontinue bad macs and keep up with the new one's, and microsoft will keep selling good and bad computers, and if you pay attencion to any good PC, you will notice the price is 2500 dollars or more with the same hardware as a mac....oh my god I hate it when people think they know how a buisiness works, **** me...
Ok, this has nothing to do with what the actual game is going to be like, or well maybe treyarch will keep in mind some of the ideas that they like, now you fools, I don't know if you can read but this is "A Pro Gamer's Hopes for Black Ops II" pro gamer or not pro gamer, this is just one persons opinion that got published, again, just an opinion and will not actually be used in the game he is just saying what he would like, i'm pretty sure he is not the only one that has commented about what he would like on black ops II... Besides, I think that those are all great ideas for Black ops II.
It would be nice that the next xbox could do all that stuff but I feel like it's too much to ask for, and no, the ps3 is good, but not better than the xbox 360, I own a ps3 slim and the old fatboy xbox 360, and yes ps3 has built in wifi and psn is free and it has blu-ray, but it turns out that my dinosour xbox can do more than the ps3, at least more as a gaming console, better graphics at a higher framerate ps3 lags when playing high graphic games, people complain about xbox live not being free but xbox live has never given me any problems and when I try to play on psn there is constantly something wrong with the servers, besides, you have to pay the HD TV, the electricity buy the gaming console, buy the games and if you want to play offline that money is still over 20,000 dollars if you want to play offline, so what is so different from paying the 60 dollars a year for xbox live? 20,060 dollars? not that much of a difference if I used money for all of that I might as well crank it up to the max with xbox live...sorry, this kinda turned into a battle between the xbox 360 and the ps3....
Shane_Padget's comments