[QUOTE="aflakian"]

Not unless they have a PC.

-Skyfall

If they had a gaming PC, why would they own a 360? That's just redundant.

[QUOTE="AdmiralBison"]

When I mean by "Real" I mean closest to sort of plausible with what games are out there at the moment.

People are still sort of able to make a living, the environement is sort of living and breathing itself and has a sort of semblence to the real world. no superheroes or something super fantastic.

Also remember you are simply you. Your are not super fast, super strong, you do not level up really fast. Just as vulnerable as any of the citizen NPCs or maybe even less sufficient because you are still getting use to the game world.

Example Fallout 3. The majority of known civilization has been devastated by past nuclear wars and is now in a very similair situation like in Fall-out. Everyone is out to look out for number 1 only, They're are Ruthless gangs and Savages, bodies hanging in chains and everything you eat and rink is radiated. Plus the technology has a 1950s look to it. None of the modern tech we have.

Imagined you where all of a sudden sucked into the world of Fall out 3, and you had no money (Caps), only the clothes on your back and you found yourself in the middle of the wasteland 40 clicks away from the closest "Friendliest" town and your sure you heard a Deathclaw walking around somewhere.

You acutally feel pain, get tired, hungry, thirsty etc. and you only have your one life. Once you die, you die.

Actually my pick would have to be Fallout out 3.

No ones acutally flushes the toilets and cleans the bathrooms, some characters are really crazy and go about wiping out whole towns and I have to go out into the wastland to scrounge for a living, because I don't have actual military training, I didn't grow up with 1950 tech. Hoping I have enough ammo to fend myself from packs of savage dogs, mutants and Cocroaches big enough to bite your head off.Lol

The only thing worse I can think of is living in the World of Silent Hill, but those towns have all been abandoned.It's not plausible anyway.

What game world would you hate to live in if you where all of a sudden sucked into it indefinately.

Animal-Mother

I should also plan out what perks i'm going to pick.

The sims.-the best worst- i dunno

Camer999

Ps2 is only $99 :P But since you probably mean the ps3, N4G isn't the most reliable place to get info. That and the sale could only be affecting that one store, and it could be temporary.

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="Shafftehr"] I don't disagree with your point, I just disagree with you picking titles which were never exclusive in the first place - heck, not even close. Couldn't you come up with better examples?LosDaddie

What about Virtua Fighter?

I dunno....I'm trying to think of other franchised MS 'stole" from Sony, but I can't think of any other.

[QUOTE="LosDaddie"]A Unified Console would cut down development costs, free up resources, and (IMO) make for better games.

The only catch would be for MS, Sony, and Ninty to agree on the Unified Console specs, which would probably never happen.

PoppaGamer

what microsoft first party's HA!, but seriously they don't have any good first party studios really, RARE is trash I can't think of their others at the moment, If Lionhead is FP then they are good but I don't think they focus on graphics

All_that_is_Man

It's only a wikipedia page but it sounds about right. Also i don't see why this engine would have to be limited to first-party, i mean would they really deny it to a company like Bungie if they wanted to use it? Past Halo games used a first-party engine so i'm wondering what they'll do with Halo: Reach. Or maybe this is a way for MS to attract studios to go first-party for them.

Mass Effect 2. :)Stevo_the_gamer