One of my favorites :)

Anyone can edit Wikipedia, never use it as a sourceJaysonguy

That's not entirely true. Wikipedia has taken several measures to make sure that its information remains accurate. A study was done that found it to be as accurate as the Encyclopedia Britannica.

http://www.news.com/Study+Wikipedia+as+accurate+as+Britannica/2100-1038_3-5997332.html

[QUOTE="Nemme"]Definitly GH3 for me first. The line-up is much more appealing to me. If they had fire and flames on Rock band then I would reconsider but right now, there are no songs on Rock Band I'm itching to play.FlockofSpagheti

Dude I know this is a guitar only video but Rock band is about more than just guitar and songs like fire and Flames would not work. It is about being part of a team...

Just make sure your team has around $200 to pay for everything... Price will ultimately be the deciding factor. Right now, GHIII owns the casual crowd.

Strider212 - My wii number is 7898 8159 8297 3981

PM me if you add me!

Nintendo "is", not "are". Microsoft "is", not "are". Sony "is", not "are". These are all collective groups. Please read up on proper English grammar:

http://www.bartleby.com/64/C001/020.html

I'd say that your rating system is flawed when Matt C. predicts in his own review that a "certain site" will give MP3 an 8.5. Gamespot's rating system has lost all credibility for me.

This piece here in particular seals the deal to me:

"Wait, reviews are just opinions. Right?"
Actually, we don't think so. We make no excuses for our verdicts about games and believe our reviews stand for themselves. While our reviews, of course, do contain an element of subjectivity to them, we see the process of reviewing games as one that primarily involves the reporting of facts. To an extent, we naturally color these facts based on our own experiences of having spent much time playing other games in the past, but we make every effort to look at every game on its own merits, and we describe each game in the most factual terms possible. To this end, in the rare event that one of our reviews contains a factual inaccuracy, we will correct the inaccuracy and will acknowledge it in an editor's note that's appended to the end of the review.

In fanboy talk... FLOP!

But really, halo +a whole load of other fps type games > metroid prime have and will always will be.

Its a great series no doubt, i wouldnt label it the best, regardless if its one of wii's flagship titles.

Still, cant wait to try it out, has anyone played a demo of it yet.

M-G-F

I played the game at Gamestop. They had the actual game in a kiosk. To be honest, I've never played any shooter game that was so engaging. I played about an hour and a half of it, and I couldn't disagree more with GS's review. I fail to see their logic in claiming that perfect controls is a negative thing. They didn't even mention that there are three difficulty levels. According to Gamespot, the hardest setting makes the game extremely difficult. Hey, remember Veteran and Legendary on Halo? No one complained about the difficulty on any of those games.

Personally, I think Gamespot has gotten sloppy with their reviews ever since Greg left. It's one thing to try and be different from other sites, but it is another thing entirely when Matt C. over at IGN predicts that a "certain site" will give the game an 8.5. Inclusion of online multiplayer? Oh come on, they tried that with MP2. Remember It was a half-*ssed attempt then, and it would be one here too. Gamespot has become completely predictable.

[QUOTE="fitootif"]its the last Metroid PRIME not metroid games, although maybe they can have a second metroid prime for DS with the events between Metroid prime 2 and 3, but i'm still waiting for the next 2D metroid
llama1107

no, this is supposed to not only be last in the trilogy, but the last in the series. Besides, Retro Studios needs another series, Metroid is getting a bit old, if you ask me.