Sully28's forum posts

Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

is RDR on the pc? if not the loss's have to be 99% console. Thats what console players do, there is no modding or real communities, only sheep moving with the herd to the next hot thing, AKA fast food gaming, AKA console gaming.

chrion133

You make it sound like a bad thing. I am a "Fast Food Gamer" on pc as well. Hell i just bought both torch light and the total war collection for pc while im still playing other games. That doesnt mean i dont stick with certain games, i always have go-to games that have the best communities. Mine happen to be Team fortress 2, counter strike source for PC, and on ps3 its bad company 2 and socom confrontation. Like another user said, more games, more diverse experiences.

Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

3d Dot Game Heroes

Torch Light

Shattered Horrizon.

Total War Collection

Red Dead Redemption(working on this now)

Bayonetta

Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]works well in tf2Phoenix534

I never experience teamwork in Team Fortress 2. It's always just people trying to kill the other people.

All i do is play pubs in tf2 and i see teamwork all the time. It all comes down to communication, if people have mics, which they generally do, it works out nicely. A team with communication will beat a team without it everytime.

Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

Shattered Horizon(steam sale), Torch light(steam sale), Civilization 4(steam sale, only got it for the expansions i never got), 3d dot game heroes, and will be getting red dead redemption tomarrow. I wont be experiencing any form of a summer drought

Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

Not saying the rest of the game is bad, because its definitely an amazing game the entire way through, but the first hour of that game is done so flawlessly it would have been nearly impossible to keep that kind of action up the entire game

BPoole96

You bring up a good point. There are a few instances that feel just as epic as the begining, but the start of the game is easily one of the most outstanding openings to a game ever.

Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

I don't find anything wrong with the demos, I still find them very enjoyable. Most reviewers so far are being pretty nitpicky about the game. They say the controls are bad, WHAT? I had the controls down in 30 seconds!

Until I get the game on Tues I refuse to believe this BS.

darthvader1993

If you actually read the reviews they mention many more problems besides the controls. In fact, i dont even remember the GS review talking about the controls.

Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

Is raven shield that hard? I want to try out this game along with swat 4 to see whats all the fuss is about. I'm just hoping the game is not that hard even on the easiest level.

TheShadowLord07

SWAT 4 is an excellent game. The easy difficulty is easy you shouldnt have any trouble.

I really wish they would come out with another SWAT game, i cant even remember how much time i wasted on 4.

Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

Why can't they just play local coop?

Same experience as online, no?

Chutebox

No, its not. Compare playing splitscreen halo to online halo. Its fun, but its a whole new experience. Also with the way MNR is set up it is a bit deciving, with the games main lobby being fully intergrated online and all.

Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="ihsanqueen"] Well, Kojima said he wants to make games that can be played by everyone everytimeKashiwaba

I accidentally tripped over this, it's not confirmed though http://news.vgchartz.com/news.php?id=79909&mp=1

Hope this is true but still Im getting this first day on PSP.

I actually might hold off on getting the psp version for a little bit and wait for some news to unfold on this PSN version. I dont mind playing on the psp, but id prefer to play it on a ps3 with a controller.

Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

6

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

[QUOTE="meconate"]

Before I get flamed, I'd just like to say that I have played games on the PC and have enjoyed them, I haven't made this topic to be a troll and rip the crap out of PC gamers. I'm just curious as to know how PC gamers say that the PC will always be the best among all home consoles. These are the reasons why I personally think home consoles are better for gaming:

1: Someone who has no idea about how to install new graphics cards, CPU, RAM, etc might not be prepared to spend tons of money to buy a PC that plays the latest games when they could just easily go out and buy a home console that doesn't require any hardware installation.

2: The online (in my opinion) is much more fun on a home console than on a PC as it's much easier to join games and chat to friends.

3: Keyboard and mouse is kinda hard to get used to for a beginner to video games, and I know you can install controllers, but much configuration is needed and un-necessary when you could just use a console that has a basic controller set-up and always has a controller.

4: Home Consoles start up fast and can be played straight away. PC's require installation and for the actual PC to start up. There's no "a quick game" where PC's are concerned.

At the moment I can't think of any more reasons, and yes I might be maybe wrong in some point, and again, I'm not trying to say PC gaming is wrong, but can anyone tell me how PC's are always the best for gaming?

Fizzman

1. If you have ever used Lego's as a child you know how to install a videocard.

2. Every option available on console is available on PC's.

3. Not gonna even debate this cause its ridiculousKB/M provides a much more precise experience.

4. My PC starts up in 30 seconds about the same as my 360 and after I intall a game I dont need the disk anymore. Also Steam allows preloading So i can play a game before console users sometimes.

Of course preferring Console gaming doesnt make you a bad person and is perfectly ok.

1. Agreed.

2. Not every option available on consoles is on PC. Besides PS3, 360, and Wii exclusives, the PC lacks in platforming, JRPG, and Action games(GOW, Bayonetta, etc). And honestly it makes sense, it wouldbe atrocious playing a game like ratchet and clank or bayonetta on PC.

3. Its preferance. I would take KB/M over a controller 80% of the time, but there is still that 20%. For example i hate third person shooters on KB/M, it never feels right.

4. I dont care how fast your PC starts up, or if you require a disk or not, PC will never be more convinent for playing games then consoles.

Both PC's and Consoles have their advantages and disadvantages. Personally i think the PC being the best is BS. I alwways buy obvious games for me PC, such as RPGS, any game made by valve, most fps games, etc. But i still buy more games for my ps3 and still buy games on ps3 despite it being on PC because of friends. Its all preference.