Entertainment.

[QUOTE="jjccjj92"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"]KZ2 was a way better game then Halo 3. 90+ MC and best competitive MP. Gamtrix

Killzone 2, in terms of graphics, was trounced by a 2007 game. And its multiplayer is poor, unbalanced and a pure joke compared to Halo 3's, which would explain why people stopped playing it in March 2009.

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"]

I think the Killzone franchise has a quality that matches the best of the best out there. But becoming a "Halo", "Gran Turismo", or "Call of Duty" takes more than just quality. Marketing and accessibility is what these games do the best (not to take anything away from their quality!).

Killzone 3 could go on to sell millions, but I'm not sure it will sell any more than 5, if it even reaches that mark. In terms of critical success and community adoration, I bet it will fair extremely well :). Killzone 3D inbound!

Zaibach

If Killzone 3 hits 5 million, then it's a gigantic success (for a PlayStation 3 title).

I bet ODST, Call of Duty 4, Modern Warfare 2, Grand Theft Auto IV and World at War have, too.

Nobody really cares about Crysis 2, really.

I think the Killzone franchise has a quality that matches the best of the best out there. But becoming a "Halo", "Gran Turismo", or "Call of Duty" takes more than just quality. Marketing and accessibility is what these games do the best (not to take anything away from their quality!).

Killzone 3 could go on to sell millions, but I'm not sure it will sell any more than 5, if it even reaches that mark. In terms of critical success and community adoration, I bet it will fair extremely well :). Killzone 3D inbound!

Episode_Eve

If Killzone 3 hits 5 million, then it's a gigantic success (for a PlayStation 3 title).

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

Killzone 2 campaign is better that Halo 3,second both games have weakness and strenghts,for exmaple Halo 3 has a more robust set of features online,yet it doesn't feature bots,Killzone 2 lacks online co-op see where i am going.

Saying Halo does everything better is a total lie,Killzone 2 was just not graphics dude,in fact it had better AI that Halo 3 as well and sound as well,but if we go for longevity like you calin Killzone 2 beat Halo 3 and Reahc as well,because on 360 longevity cost $50 a year on PS3 is out of the box,and that is something people love to ignore.

Eltormo

Killzone 2's longevity was laughable. People stopped playing that game shortly after its release, whereas Halo 3 entertained people for years.

People still playing Killzone 2 dude,hell Warhawk has like 13,000 community and did not sold half of what Killzone 2 sold,again longevity on 360 cost money,is and add on on 360 on PS3 is free,there is no way around that,also the fact that some one is playing a game for years in nothing say is better than other dude,that is just sad.

What does the fact that XBL is not free have to do with this?

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

MMM i see you played both games for start to finish,can you tell of why Halo Reach will destroy KIllzone 3,you know with spoiler tags so those who don't want to know about the story and every thing from both games yet.

Eltormo

I think he's pretty much correct (without being a fanboy). Just like Killzone 2 looked prettier than Halo 3, Killzone 3's graphics will transcend Halo: Reach's. But when it came to everything else (campaign, music, characters, longevity, multiplayer, sales, gameplay, controls), Killzone 2 was cut into small bits. And that's the reason Reach is bound to poop all over Killzone 3.

Killzone 2 campaign is better that Halo 3,second both games have weakness and strenghts,for exmaple Halo 3 has a more robust set of features online,yet it doesn't feature bots,Killzone 2 lacks online co-op see where i am going.

Saying Halo does everything better is a total lie,Killzone 2 was just not graphics dude,in fact it had better AI that Halo 3 as well and sound as well,but if we go for longevity like you calin Killzone 2 beat Halo 3 and Reahc as well,because on 360 longevity cost $50 a year on PS3 is out of the box,and that is something people love to ignore.

Killzone 2's longevity was laughable. People stopped playing that game shortly after its release, whereas Halo 3 entertained people for years.

[QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"]Sorry TC but nothing on the PS3 can match Halo. Reach is going to destroy it in every single way possible.Eltormo

MMM i see you played both games for start to finish,can you tell of why Halo Reach will destroy KIllzone 3,you know with spoiler tags so those who don't want to know about the story and every thing from both games yet.

I think he's pretty much correct (without being a fanboy). Just like Killzone 2 looked prettier than Halo 3, Killzone 3's graphics will transcend Halo: Reach's. But when it came to everything else (campaign, music, characters, longevity, multiplayer, sales, gameplay, controls), Killzone 2 was cut into small bits. And that's the reason Reach is bound to poop all over Killzone 3.

[QUOTE="GrabTheYayo"]halo is the god father of fps.Orchid87

That's sig-worthy :roll:

On consoles.

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"] so its not unique thenRatchet_Fan8

In the gaming world, it is.

A Hollywood producer claimed that, not me. But it's pretty much true.