TheMaryCeleste's forum posts

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

[QUOTE="Orchid87"]

What is unique about it?

TintedEyes

Pretty much everything? It's gaming's Star Wars.

so its not unique then

In the gaming world, it is.

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

Pretty much everything? It's gaming's Star Wars.

Orchid87

Man, I hate that picture...

Have you got anything more suitable?

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="Orchid87"]

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

The Halo series is unique.

Gamtrix

What is unique about it?

It's uniquely generic and outdated :P Hey Reach is adding sprint! It's modernizing itself a bit :D

The Halo series contains among the most successful and critically acclaimed FPS games of all time. Generic shooters are those that try to kill it, such as the atrocious Killzone, Haze and Resistance.

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

The Halo series is unique.

Orchid87

What is unique about it?

Pretty much everything? It's gaming's Star Wars.

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"]

[QUOTE="Orchid87"]

But KZ2 excels at the former two while the latter is the matter of taste.

Orchid87

That may be but it doesn't make the game original.

No FPS is original.

The Halo series is unique.

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

If Halo is so "overrated and generic", then why is Sony even trying to have their own "Halo"? ;)

FragTycoon

Because it's fanboys saying it.. not Sony.

Killzone has never tried to have the same style or feel of Halo, that's why I like it over all the other copycat FPS (witch include Halo itself)

Dude, don't you think that Sony want to see Killzone receive the same acclaim and sales as Halo?

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"][QUOTE="FragTycoon"]

Because it's fanboys saying it.. not Sony.

Killzone has never tried to have the same style or feel of Halo, that's why I like it over all the other copycat FPS (witch include Halo itself)

FragTycoon

Yeah because Killzone is totally not copycat and completely original.

Lets start from the beginning so we are on the same page... have you played Killzone 1 and 2?

Exactly why would he want to play a 6.9 game that failed in a pretty miserable manner?

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="chaplainDMK"][QUOTE="Anjunaddict"]

And? Does Killzone have the features of customisation that Halo offers? Something which i think is a lot more important than superficial graphics.

Anjunaddict

*fails argument* Uh ... but it has this!!!! Yes, Halo has way superior customatisation, and i will enjoy it for that. It also has way more vareity in the guns, I will enjoy it for that. It will have a vareity of game modes so you always have something to do, I will enjoy it for that. But stop comparing Halo: Reach to Killzone 3 because its the best looking Halo so far. Halo Reach has its pros and cons, Killzone 3 has its pros and cons. No game is flawless, but both of these games will most probably be amazing in their own right...

Well i don't know about all you gamers, but to me, graphics is not top of my list in terms of what i look for in a game. I couldn't care less that Killzone 3 is uber pretty, its the gameplay, the content, the story etc that will get me interested in it.

Thats why i love the Halo games so much, Bungie focus on whats important rather than making the games uber pretty. And if allowing 4 player splitscreen means the graphics have to be toned down a bit, then Bungie will do it.

I don't think anyone cares about the graphics that much. What kind of impact did Crysis have on the gaming community? It was a great game - the most beautiful graphics ever seen - but people chose Call of Duty 4 and Halo 3 instead.

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

Killzone 3 looks better and with improved controls could become a very popular FPS, but the popularity of Halo still holds, even though KZ3 might be a better game IMO, the only thing holding it back was the controls and thats been fixed, and yes I played Halo also.

deniiiii21

I personally think that Killzone 3 will be a great game, but sadly forgotten months after its relese.

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"]

[QUOTE="chaplainDMK"] *fails argument* Uh ... but it has this!!!! Yes, Halo has way superior customatisation, and i will enjoy it for that. It also has way more vareity in the guns, I will enjoy it for that. It will have a vareity of game modes so you always have something to do, I will enjoy it for that. But stop comparing Halo: Reach to Killzone 3 because its the best looking Halo so far. Halo Reach has its pros and cons, Killzone 3 has its pros and cons. No game is flawless, but both of these games will most probably be amazing in their own right...chaplainDMK

Well i don't know about all you gamers, but to me, graphics is not top of my list in terms of what i look for in a game. I couldn't care less that Killzone 3 is uber pretty, its the gameplay, the content, the story etc that will get me interested in it.

Thats why i love the Halo games so much, Bungie focus on whats important rather than making the games uber pretty. And if allowing 4 player splitscreen means the graphics have to be toned down a bit, then Bungie will do it.

Somebody started a graphical argument and I'm just saying that claiming that Reach looks better then Killzone 2 is preaty far fetched. I agree that Killzone fails in places that Halo shines, but Halo also fails in places that Killzone shines. Its just the way games go, no game can be perfect...

Halo: Reach fails in one place Killzone shines.