Onision
EdwardCurrent
Thunderf00t
Mr. Eviliution777
TheArchFiend
GusMonkey
Forum Posts | Following | Followers |
---|---|---|
4994 | 10 | 47 |
I decided to dress my kitten in a Santa outfit. Not before taking him a nice shower.
Click here to see the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mc1hpGriBc is the link.
For a more detailed opinion, please check out my video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYi0WvSsaDM
Do you ever have an issue where the person behind the register will not speak to you in English first? Well I do.
I have multi-racial features. Some people have talked to me in Spanish, French, and Arabic languages. I don't have a problem with people speaking different languages on their own time, but I do feel that if they're working in a business, no matter what area they are doing their business in, they should by all means greet the guest, or customer with English first.
It seems that many people get offended when one person who appears of a certain ethnicty, is deemed knowledge automatically, for which they are bilingual.
Why?
If a person looks Chinese, or Japanese, why do we assume that they speak the languages fluently? Why?
People have told me all sorts of offensive things because I don't like to speak Spanish, and because I'm hispanic. What's the big deal?
I know that we live in a society where we all have to cater to other ethnicities because people are lazy. I can't deny that. You see it all the time. It's not opinion at this point. It's fact. It's the world we live in.
I feel so lost when I'm here in Los Angeles. Sometimes, I think I'm living in Mexico. And people expect me to speak in Spanish. If I don't, I'm a traitor. It's so amazing to see how offended and rude people can get when I don't make an effort to cater to their inability to speak English.
I thought that if a person chooses to live in a country such as the United States of America, that it'd be important to speak English.
How do you feel?
I'm sorry but those poll choices are awful, so I am not going to vote. I will say here that it does NOT fail, and to me it is the best of the series.
Ultrabeatdown55
The polls aren't awful. It was done in a way to make people chuckle.
your review - if it's yours - is mostly a story recap and is thus full of major spoilers. please modify accordingly.
on topic - i don't like it. I've always thought Yates to be the weakest Potter film director, and his shortcomings show prominently in this latest installment. he's good with creating memorable moments through slick cinematography and setpieces, which Deathly Hallows has no lack of. but the film is ultimately bogged down by his inconsistent pacing and weak narrative. i am, once again, sorely disappointed.
PS. that particular scene - you know what - is disgusting to no end and has no business being in a Potter film. i have no problem with gore and violence, but that? that is freaking ridiculous.
Jinroh_basic
It's my review. My wife was in bed with me, while I kept her up, writing it.
I loved the film and so did my wife.
I thought it was enjoyable and it was worth it.
Here's the review. Click Here
[spoiler]The Harry Potter Franchise has been strong. A true saga written from the imaginative mind of J.K. Rowling spawning the success of several movies to take on the adaptation of the books.
There's plenty of magic and pop-culture magnetism, where an audience feels attached to Harry James Potter, Ronald Wesley, and Hermione Granger.
The two ending movies has plenty of pressure from movie goers to be epic, grand, and overall satisfying with magical expectations that no wizard can ever conjurer. It is one with incantations of long Latin based words, sighted with wand in hand.
As with any Harry Potter movie, the atmosphere of these last two movies hasn't lost any splendor of the Potter universe, even with the grim and serious tone that of the Deathly Hallows.
The tale of three brothers who sought a means of cheating death, with a delightful ability of creating a bridge, with their imagination to cross the other side, with weaving vine, root, and branching out, hath Death scoff to foil with cunning wit.
"Death be not proud, for some call me mighty and dreadful, art no so."
Death granted the three brothers the gift of riches and choice. One brother sought a powerful deadly wand that is lusted, feared, eventually taken by foe, after the brother murdered, and boasted of how invincible he was. The first brother died as he feel asleep, slain by another. The second brother wanted the gift of necro-observation-- the glancing of loved ones that have past to the neatherealm. Death gave this man the gift of an illusive experience of communicating with the dead through imagination, that the second brother drove himself mad. The final brother sought none of the folly of man. Only the cloak of death himself, to be invisible from death until a lifespan was fullfilled should he give his cloak to his own flesh and blood, and accept gladly his mortal fate the journey with death.
The order of the Phoenix--- the very symbol of an Egyptian bird, is one that dies and blazes away into a perpetual cycle of rebirth only to die and so forth--a path way against the Dark Lord, whence Voldemort and Harry are themselves the Horicrux and not objects alone are to be only considered as such.
Harry doesn't realize it yet, but to kill Voldemort, he must first die himself. It was the love of Harry's mom, that prevented the fatality of Harry, with the sacrifice of parental catering against the darklord, with their effort of protecting their only son. The theme is sacrifice. Power and magic isn't enough. But it is the very nature of sacrifice that is the ending result which is how Dolby met his death with his loving protection whilst saving Harry, Luna, Ron, and Hermione
The movie isn't about special effects. The direction is solidified with great carefulness where Voldemort grasp Professor Dumbledore's wand. A wand so powerful that even Voldemort hasn't a clue of it's potential as he laughs holding the essence of its power in a dark cold night, at the small island of the late Dumbledore.
If not a ether-realm of two universes where magic and reality clash. Where the ministry of magic, at odds with the normality of the muggles- the half breed of wizard and human, against the prejudice of the true-blood, bias of a full wizard of rite.
The locations are dramatic, gleaming the valleys of several highlands, to the icy forest covered with snow. It is nothing more than breathtaking, and it is the prelude to a movement that will intensify with some huge climax.
The movie leaves you wanting more--- making you feel like your interruption from actual reality unfair. This is a good thing. This is truly what I want before the finale.
To resolve the inevitable is to except complete self-destruction and sacrifice.
The actors Daniel, Emma, and Rupert should hail this project as the beginning of their careers by its seriousness.
My opinion of their acting ****is that they really give you that illusion that they are the characters and that they believe in their character. It translates with their puberty and coming of age as they are now adults. The dialog is believable. The music is a fulfillment of the tension and nature of the characters during scenario and location. There is balance. It is like no scale I've seen where a paperweight or feather easily out do each other due to the mass by its pound, ounce, or matter.
It is balance with adult complexity where Harry struggles to find himself has he reminisces about his part experiences.
For the first time, Harry has to make adult decisions with out the guidance of his elders. He finally is truly a wizard, even without his original wand.
Perhaps this story is more about excepting the tact of adapting to a difficult decision as it's theme. The crafting of a man and the understanding behind the things taught at Hogwarts.
The finale is coming soon. 2011 is almost here. July assumed. Probably pushed back to another date. To be announced..
[QUOTE="redstorm72"]First of all, I'm not wrong. Sign flipping or holding does not grab my attention. So, for me, it is pointless.thegergNo, your original statement was wrong. It's not pointless, it's advertising. Now you are saying something different. "It doesn't grab my attention" and "it's pointless" are two very different things.
Secondly, since you seem so unhappy, I will rephrase my statement. "I believe that sign flipping/holding is an ineffective method of advertising".redstorm72Haha. I'm not unhappy, trust me. What makes you think that it is ineffective? Like I told that other poster, you're not the only one on this planet and your personal opinion matters very little. Simply because you do not find it ineffective does not mean that it is inherently ineffective. Also, can you describe for us an advertisement that you do think is effective?
Hold on just a minute. How can you lie like that. It bothers you obviously right? A personal opinion is enough to get you into a long and tedious argument.
But to answer your question, advertisement works because you are surrounded by it from media, websites, gaming review websites, public opinion, and hearsay. Flipping signs is an ineffective way of gaining attention from the masses.
So we have someone arguing against giving poor people jobs? What? You make no sense?Mousetaches
People that apply for jobs are naturally poor. That's why they need to get a job. To make money.
The truth is, we're all one step away from unemployment. But people should take pride in themselves.
"You make no sense?"----- Mousetaches, this isn't a question. It's a comment.
[QUOTE="TheStatusQuo"][QUOTE="mattbbpl"] I understand that you think it's a fabricated lie to keep the unprofitable practice afloat - I'm stuck on why a company would want to keep an unprofitable and ineffective marketing practice afloat.
thegerg
Do you remember Circuit City? What about GameCrazy?
What good did flipping signs do for them.Did it help business?
Ahahahahahahaha!! You're just being silly now. First you're making political claims and blaming Republicans. Now you want to prove that this form of advertising doesn't work because Circuit City went out of business?Matt was suggesting that flippinga sign creates revenue.
Business that are failing usually have people that flip signs. They will also have balloons. I know about business. I know about it very well. Flipping signs is not effective.
[QUOTE="TheStatusQuo"]
[QUOTE="mattbbpl"] I understand that you think it's a fabricated lie to keep the unprofitable practice afloat - I'm stuck on why a company would want to keep an unprofitable and ineffective marketing practice afloat.
mattbbpl
Do you remember Circuit City? What about GameCrazy?
What good did flipping signs do for them.Did it help business?
Seriously, you have got to be kidding me.....
"If he was so smart, how come he's dead?"
What about Carl's Jr?
What about Gamestop?
And no, I'm not kidding.
Log in to comment