[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Rude_Bwoii"]

The guy has no clue just look at his comments it would not surprise me if he did not have a gaming pc. Even if he did it is a very old one going by his comments on graphics so talking to him is a waste of time imo.

Xtasy26

I own a GTX285 and a I920 processor , and talking in SW is always a waste of time. But im bored at work so it works out perfect . We have hermits who think Cryostatsis is far beyond anything on consoles. A game that has had no graphical praise anywhere other then here on SW. And im the one wasting peoples time?

Oh I get it, it has to win graphical praise to be counted. There you go again using the "awards" argument to make your point.

So, I guess MGS4 is the best looking game from 2008 because it sure beat out Crysis Warhead. :roll:LMAO.

Crysis warhead got praise everywhere , and won on alot of websites.

Metro2033 is barely mentioned outside of SW.

Of all the games you are mentioning only one is worth arguing for the rest are not.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="Xtasy26"]

MGS4 has horrible shadows and the textures in the game look BAD. And since it runs in sub-HD the game looks disgustingly blurry, ESPECIALLY on a big screen.

Compare that to Crysis Warhead running on PC on all ENTHUSIASTS in FULL HD 1080P with 4X FSAA and 16X Anistrophic Filtering. I mean it's like comparing the Los Angeles Lakers to a High School basketball team.

Xtasy26

And Crysis at those settings at that time ran at like 15fps lmao part of the reason it didnt win here.

It runs fine on my gaming rig. I guess that would validate my arguement that maybe GS editors don't have the gaming rig to run it maxed.

And who cares if someone can't run it maxed out. Maybe YOU can't but there are PLENTY of other people who were able to run it at those settings, that doesn't change the fact that Crysis Warhead is MILES AHEAD MGS4 in graphics.

Have you had the same rig since 2008? And like it or not thats why GS didnt give it the reward its not my fault. Yet it still won other places. Unlike METRO who couldnt get it anywhere.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

Im not mad at all your just cant read try reading post before you jump into the middle of the argument.

1. I dont care what you think im not gonna argue over something if i havent played the game.

2. All the big ones do. Gamespot, IGN, Gametrailers, and many more.

3. And Crysis Warhead won it on many websites the games hes mentioning are not mentioned anywhere Metro2033 and Cryostatsis? Really?

ChubbyGuy40

1. I'm not gonna care what some hater says either.

2. Gamespot finally does. IGN does. ConsoleTrailers? Not a chance.

3. Clearly Warhead was better than anything that year. The only reason Metro had to be left out of so many awards/nominations is because they reviewed the 360 version which is piss-ugly and lower than low settings on PC.

They gave the pc version a higher score at IGN and GS so that blows your theory out of the water right there.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

Heck even Direct x 9 on high setting blow the console versions out of the water.

ChubbyGuy40

Versions? Its only on the 360 and Rage romps over DX9 Metro not to mention its far bigger.

Why specifically DX9 Metro? Oh ya, you didn't play it. If you did, you'd know theres little to no differences. DX11 is only used to turn on additional effects.

So tesselation means nothing??? I think it added quite a bit made some of the textures look outstanding, but hey ill let you take that up with the rest the hermits.

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

No it doesnt I dont see it having 50++ characters on screen at a time and GOW 3 won best visuals EVERYWHERE not just here on gamespot . Metro2033 is garbage you can blabber about tesselation and dof all you want if its not done well who cares. Once again only here on SW does metro 2033 get any praise . Yet I guess the entire gaming media has never played metro 2033 there all just sheltered consoleites. :roll:

Rude_Bwoii

Woah woah woah... your saying Metro 2011 is garbage? It`s one of the best looking games to date! You obvisouly didn't play it in Dx11.

The guy has no clue just look at his comments it would not surprise me if he did not have a gaming pc. Even if he did it is a very old one going by his comments on graphics so talking to him is a waste of time imo.

I own a GTX285 and a I920 processor , and talking in SW is always a waste of time. But im bored at work so it works out perfect . We have hermits who think Cryostatsis is far beyond anything on consoles. A game that has had no graphical praise anywhere other then here on SW. And im the one wasting peoples time?

[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

Woah woah woah... your saying Metro 2011 is garbage? It`s one of the best looking games to date! You obvisouly didn't play it in Dx11.

04dcarraher

Heck even Direct x 9 on high setting blow the console versions out of the water.

Versions? Its only on the 360 and Rage romps over DX9 Metro not to mention its far bigger.

MGS4 has horrible shadows and the textures in the game look BAD. And since it runs in sub-HD the game looks disgustingly blurry, ESPECIALLY on a big screen.

Compare that to Crysis Warhead running on PC on all ENTHUSIASTS in FULL HD 1080P with 4X FSAA and 16X Anistrophic Filtering. I mean it's like comparing the Los Angeles Lakers to a High School basketball team.

Xtasy26

And Crysis at those settings at that time ran at like 15fps lmao part of the reason it didnt win here.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="cobrax55"]

:lol: 11 million is WOW's subscriber base, as in the amount of people currently paying $15 a month, not its total sales. Its sales are much higher then that.

cobrax55

:|

You honestly think every suscriber is an individual person? Have you ever played WOW ? LMAO really dude?

really, thats your argument now? that people are paying $30 a month for multiple accounts.

Thats really what youve fallen back on.:lol: You think everybody in the game has a second account

This is just pathetic at this point.

And still doesnt change the fact that WOW has sold more then any console game.

Show me a link where its sold more then any console game because right now you are just babbling.

And not everyone does but some own 3 and some own 5 i know because I knew some farmers that use to make money that way. Lots of people own multiple accounts this is a common practice in any MMO and you get alot more money back then the 30$ you spend each month. You simply have no clue what your talking about.

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

No it doesnt I dont see it having 50++ characters on screen at a time and GOW 3 won best visuals EVERYWHERE not just here on gamespot . Metro2033 is garbage you can blabber about tesselation and dof all you want if its not done well who cares. Once again only here on SW does metro 2033 get any praise . Yet I guess the entire gaming media has never played metro 2033 there all just sheltered consoleites. :roll:

Xtasy26

Woah woah woah... your saying Metro 2011 is garbage? It`s one of the best looking games to date! You obvisouly didn't play it in Dx11.

He thinks MGS4 looks better than Crysis Warhead because it won an "award". So, what do you expect?

I have a PS4 and I played MGS4, to say MGS4 looks better than Crysis Warhead is like saying a Ford Pinto is better than a Ferrari.

I dont think you own a PS3, I know you dont own a PS4 lol

I never said MGS4 looked better then warhead yet we already know you cant read lmao.

[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

Woah woah woah... your saying Metro 2011 is garbage? It`s one of the best looking games to date! You obvisouly didn't play it in Dx11.

ChubbyGuy40

You don't even need DX10. DX9 maxed out is amazing. Hell even medium is good.

So whats with other people arguing about needing high rigs if they look so amazing even on medium? Theres a vast diffrence in opionion between most gamers the media and the hermits in SW.