[QUOTE="MrGeezer"][QUOTE="Marksman2200"]

Transitive property wins

Maul beaten by Obi-Wan who is beaten by Vader, therefore Vader would beat Maul.

Marksman2200

Vader never beat Obi-Wan. :|

Are we not counting the 4th movie where Luke is watching a legit fight?

[QUOTE="TheWindWaker11"][QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"][QUOTE="Tsunami23"][QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]

[QUOTE="Aquat1cF1sh"]I think Obama got owned when McCain was like "You just don't sit across from someone and say 'We won't let you bomb our country'", or was that just Obama not being able to explain himself?SaintLeonidas

of course not, instead you wait for them to bomb, then as millions are dead then you day, you made a mistake....you need to have talks with your enemies, you cant hold off until one side attacks the other.

I don't think that was his point...

well like when McCain said "are you just going to sit there and let them say we will destory Israel and then respond with no you wont" and people laughed...um yeah actaully thats what should be done, there should be talks, verbal "wars' ina sense before actual wars. You can just sit back and let the president of Iran run his mouth saying this and that, and just sit back and let him do it.

You mean.....Talking? But but but.... We have nukes. language was outdated about 40 years ago.

so what are you saying? You agree that we shouldnt have talks...that we should sit back and let these countries build up and rn their mouths and only take action when someone stikes?

No we should have talks with these people. i was being sarcastic. It seems that since the cold war negotiations have been thrown to the way side. Pre-emptive verbal strikes rather than "bomb the hell out of a country then rebuild". Sorry if i sounded serious

[QUOTE="Tsunami23"][QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]

[QUOTE="Aquat1cF1sh"]I think Obama got owned when McCain was like "You just don't sit across from someone and say 'We won't let you bomb our country'", or was that just Obama not being able to explain himself?SaintLeonidas

of course not, instead you wait for them to bomb, then as millions are dead then you day, you made a mistake....you need to have talks with your enemies, you cant hold off until one side attacks the other.

I don't think that was his point...

well like when McCain said "are you just going to sit there and let them say we will destory Israel and then respond with no you wont" and people laughed...um yeah actaully thats what should be done, there should be talks, verbal "wars' ina sense before actual wars. You can just sit back and let the president of Iran run his mouth saying this and that, and just sit back and let him do it.

You mean.....Talking? But but but.... We have nukes. language was outdated about 40 years ago.

[QUOTE="TheWindWaker11"]

[QUOTE="Tsunami23"]Obama goes off on way too many tangents. It's getting annoying.AMitch24

Obama has tangents. McCain has sap stories. Both are extremely annoying

I would rather listen to a professor getting his point across, than a grandfather telling the same war story over and over and over again.

I agree. McCain seems to be getting flustered. He seems to think that his war stories embody his points. people die in war. People are remorseful about death. We freaking get it.

Next time, Obama needs to make his points much more direct. Because they give you 2 minutesdoesn't necessarily mean you need to use it. if you can explain it in thirty seconds, do it. Let McCain ramble for 5 minutes about how he once lived next to a terrorist so he knows how to talk to them.

Obama goes off on way too many tangents. It's getting annoying.Tsunami23

Obama has tangents. McCain has sap stories. Both are extremely annoying