@DragonSlayer_29 This argument is ignorant and old. PC has just as many exclusives as consoles.

@RupKumars I'm not sure what you're talking about.

A $500 PC built in 2010 is going to be based around something like this:

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/build-a-pc-overclock-athlon-ii-x3,2811.html

And not really close at all to the PS4's hardware.

@I2edShift This type of rhetoric shows up every console launch cycle as gaming companies try to convince console kiddies that the new console tech is pure awesomesauce.

I guess I'm just used to it.

@RupKumars Nope... a $500 2010 PC won't even be close to the power of a PS4.

@I2edShift Keyword here is "most"... and "most" people don't have anything even close to the power of a GTX 680.

Obviously the PS4 isn't as powerful as a 680.

Most PCs? Sure. High end PCs ($700+ 2012 or later builds)? No.

@KarlosBog But THIS review is the right way to do it - the problem is the other reviews where GS just tried to ignore the glaring problems.

@eddyoshiWell let's see... the ending was obviously the most controversial and disliked part of the game. So obviously, a review of the game should address that, right? Maybe warn customers they may wind up unhappy with it?

Nope. Instead, GS praises the game for a "fulfilling story" with a "jaw dropping" conclusion - and they mean that in a good way. An absolute joke of a review right there. The ending sure did drop people's jaws,but not in the way GS's review implies it would.

A gigantic, steamy, stinky pile of BS from Mr. Van Ord on that one.

@Lord_Python1049 @The_Beanster @Hunting_town Diablo 3 and ME3's reviews were a steamy pile of BS from gamespot last year.

@Hunting_town And isn't it sad that an honest review is so surprising these days?