@mike_on_mic If you're talking about stuff like the Watch Dogs demo, that was running on PC.

@Spartan_418 ZOMG FIVE GDDR BUY NOW!!!!!

morons

@Arab_Spring doesn't rehashing over multiple generations make them worse?

Just saying... I don't think your logic holds up as well as you think it does.

@joalopes @The_Beanster because comparing framerate in a benchmark to framerate in a game is comparing apples to oranges

They are designed with different purposes in mind.

@enrique_marrodz @The_Beanster @OuTLaWzGamer Who said I was complaining? I'm not complaining necessarily, I'm just pointing out the irony of Nintendo being the one to make these comments.

@edinko I heard you get 5 fps for each GDDR you have in your system

@OuTLaWzGamer I didn't say their games are bad. But they're largely formulaic and the same, and have been for many many years.

This is rich coming from a company who basically survives on re-releasing the same games over and over and over for 3 decades.

@joalopes @thundercave01 Do you even realize that the UE4 demo ran at higher settings on a single 680 than what they put on the PS4?

@joalopes I don't even know what you are talking about. Next gen consoles are going to be doing great to render games at 1080p30. Those same games will be playable at higher framerates, higher settings, and higher resolution on a suitably high end PC. You do realize that they had to turn down the settings in the UE4 tech demo to get it to run on a PS4, right?

I wasn't talking about cost at all. Obviously PS4 will probably beat PCs for a year or two in terms of performance-per-dollar. But not in terms of raw performance. Not even close.