@grove12345 @Simplythebest12 That's your fault for building a crappy rig. Because there were a ton of build options in 2007-2008 available that chew through skyrim quite nicely.

@leandrro @Cypress131 @The_Beanster @lmaocarrots @ItzItazuki #notthepoint

@leandrro You're moving the goalposts. I know you don't like it, but Crysis 3 (and every future DX11-only game on PC that also runs on current gen - dunno how many there will be) breaks the rule that you can build a rig when consoles are released and play the same games at the same or better settings throughout it's life.

#dealwithit

@leandrro @The_Beanster @Cypress131 @lmaocarrots @ItzItazuki Yes, but Crysis 3 is the one legit argument for consoles here. If you built a PC when the last gen came out, you MUST have upgraded by now to play Crysis 3. That's not the case for console - that same console you build 6 years ago will play Crysis 3 just fine.

@joalopes better graphics than the average PC? Maybe. Better graphics than a high end PC? Nope.

@grove12345 @cryofax A PC from early 2007 runs skyrim at higher settings and double the resolution of an Xbox 360

Get a clue.

@lmaocarrots @The_Beanster lol you need glasses

I for one will keep enjoying my jaggy & giant square free gaming experience.

@grove12345 @The_Beanster consoles play at a bit under 720p resolution, which is about the lowest resolution you would ever use on a PC

And typically at low settings equivalent

@leandrro @The_Beanster @Cypress131 @lmaocarrots @ItzItazuki The 6450 isn't 6 years old. You can't play Crysis 3 on a 6 year old GPU because it relies on a DirectX API that wasn't available or supported 6 years ago.

Sorry.

@grove12345 @The_Beanster 8800 GTS 320 bought for $270 paired with an early core 2 CPU. Played Skyrim at medium-high settings at 1080p (which is a lot more than consoles do), for example.

Also, lowest resolution and lowest settings is all consoles do, so again - your point is invalid.