I also made a full game in Super Mario Maker 2 whose levels are supposed to play like classic Nintendo stages. I don't have the social media reach that this guy has, nor do I care to, but to the few people who have played my levels, I hope you enjoyed.
My favorite genre and probably the main reason I always buy the Nintendo system first in a new generation. I would add Pac-Man World RePac to the list, though admittedly it's not as good as most mentioned here. It's just a nice, simplistic throwback to the PS1 days. You could also put the Crash and Spyro trilogies on here. Not Crash 4, though. I played through it, and its "extra content" is nothing but absolute, abject tedium.
@gamerbum: Actually, this is the third time this game has received an 8/10 on this site. It’s never scored anything else. Part II also got an 8/10. Kinda funny.
@thecupidstunts: How do you know that sometimes they can raise children even better than heterosexual parents? What proof do you have? What does that even mean? Do we let a heterosexual couple raise a child for a year and then switch the child over to a homosexual pretend couple for year and ask the kid which one he or she likes better? You need to start making sense.
Meanwhile, we have evidence that depriving a child of a mother or a father can be developmentally detrimental. No parent is perfect. Plenty of heterosexual parents fail miserably. That’s no justification for purposefully depriving children of either a mother or a father. Human societies have been aware of this for a very long time.
This idea of celebrating same-sex unions that “raise” children is very much a modern, western concept. Much of the world still thinks it’s bonkers. You’re trapped in a little western bubble. Just because you think it’s morally acceptable, it doesn’t mean others have to believe it so. That’s your western privilege at work. You think everyone has to believe as you do, or else they‘re subhuman.
@P00DGE: Rape, cannibalism, and incest also exists in nature among non-human species. I take it you are a proponent of those natural behaviors as well.
Anti-American? You mean the country on whose moral fiber comes from the Christian Bible? Go read the constitution of any state, especially those of the original colonies. It’s literally the Bible. Your whole argument about “showing love” and “freedom” is high-jacked from Christian principles. How about you go find some other way to argue for your sexual deviancy and leave my religion out of it.
I also see that you like to equate disliking degenerate behavior with racism. Typical of your ilk. The thing about heterosexual interracial relationships is that they can still reproduce. It still promotes the prospering of the species unlike homosexuality in which people waste their sexuality on something that can literally produce nothing. I’m glad you think I’m disgusting. You’re not my ally, and I do not want someone who advocates what you advocate to accept me in any way.
@P00DGE: Heterosexual kissing did not need to be “normalized” because it’s indicative of natural, heterosexual relationships. It was already normal before a tv screen told us it was normal.
Homosexual kissing has to be forced on us to accept it as normal because we innately feel repulsed by it since homosexual relationships do not benefit us as a species at all. It’s okay to be disgusted by that which does not further our prosperity.
@Ultima_Dragoon: Mommy and daddy can have children and further the prosperity of the human species. Mommy and mommy or daddy and daddy have to play pretend.
The_Deepblue's comments