@SecretPolice: It just goes to show the power a woman can have over a man. When a woman acts passive-aggressive or as though you’re doing something wrong, it is like a psychological poison to a man. You really do need to hold masculine frame, though, and if she doesn’t like it, you don’t give in.
However, that doesn’t mean you neglect her either. If you’re gaming too much and neglecting your wife and kids because of it, you need to scale back the gaming or other hobbies.
The combination of timing and rhythm of a good platformer is what I enjoy. I like linear platformers best. So Super Mario Galaxy Series > Super Mario 64 and Super Mario Odyssey, though they’re all 10/10 games.
Super Meat Boy and Rayman Legends are also a couple of my favorite all-time games.
“Still, the fact that there are more men lowers the odds. At least, you would think so.”
“Agreed. I would think it should be 5 women and 4 men, but I don't have any legal argument to back that up.”
“Odd so few women on the jury.”
Again, I don’t speak lib, so maybe reading between the lib’s lines or even taking a lib at face value doesn’t mean anything. Libs do have a notorious disregard for how language works after all.
@zaryia: From what I read, people were hoping that more women would be jurors because, if it involves sexual assault against a woman, then those women would cast their votes against Trump. There was sentiment posted that more women would hopefully equate to a guilty verdict.
It assumes that women won’t use their brains and that men are just going to be misogynistic and vote against the woman.
But maybe I misread you guys. I don’t speak or understand “lib” too well.
The way some of you guys sound, you might as well voluntarily give up all your rights as a human if you’re a guy.
Imagine being tasked with having to view a case objectively, to look over all the evidence, and to determine if someone is guilty but to be told that you don’t have the right judgment on this particular case because you’re a man.
You guys are literally arguing for bias to be overtly inserted into the case because you think that women will vote a certain way. I fear for the right to a fair trial in this land.
Feminism has really brainwashed the masses, not the least of which are men.
@tjandmia: Apparently I am teaching you the difference between a rule and a technicality. Which President did not win based on the Electoral College?
Technicality definition: point of law or a small detail in a set of rules.
Winning the electoral college is not a small detail. It’s the ONLY reason anyone becomes President.
What you mean to say is that it’s a rarity or an anomaly perhaps that someone wins the Electoral College yet loses the popular vote. There is no argument here. I’m just presenting fact. It might seem like a small deal to some people, but you’re misrepresenting an important system in the USA for electing presidents, and in the future, if a Republican wins the presidency again while not winning the popular vote, the media will do the same thing you’re doing: misrepresenting.
Seen: I’ll say a combination of sights during my trip out west in the United States last summer: Sequoia National Forest, Grand Canyon National Park, and the Mojave Desert.
Done: Marry my awesome wife. Have a lovely daughter. Grow in my faith.
Eaten: My mom’s chicken stir fry; my wife’s baked salmon with asparagus and Brussels sprouts and a balsamic vinaigrette sauce reduction; Chicago deep dish pizza; In n’ Out Burger Double Double Animal Style with Animal Style fries.
Log in to comment