how many people played kz sf ....it only showed demos to a certain people Fallon played it but it wasn't on the floor at E3 or comiccon and they just showing another demo at gamecon everything that ms said coming at launch is being played by people on the showrooms at high fidelity 1080p 60fps, 2.5 of gdrr5 is not going to be enough if you got a 2vram game and the gpu has to do cpu task because of gddr5 used for the whole system. That gpu is gonna take major hit.

its easy to see what's happening with the ps4 and the Xbox one with the ps4 they made the customized the gpu to do some cpu tasks so they knew that the gddr5 was gonna have cpu problems and its a problem the gpu is locked at 2gbs of vram max so you making that gpu work very hard to carry all gpu and some cpu loads with 2.5 gbs of ram left. so they might have some bad results in games that's vram hungry. Instead with the Xbox one they chosen the cloud to do the same thing but efficiency is gonna make microsoft win, windows OS, dx 11.1 and 11.2, are the heart of gaming right now and that's what's in the Xbox one

[QUOTE="blackace"][QUOTE="StormyJoe"]

Exactly where does that article say that it is a rumor?

xboxiphoneps3

[QUOTE="blackace"][QUOTE="StormyJoe"]

Exactly where does that article say that it is a rumor?

xboxiphoneps3

xbox one uses hypervisor so devs can use up to 6.5 gbs of ram so 6.5>5.5 also killzone used 4.5 gbs for a demo so they were was most likely using all of the vram that capable of being used thats close to maxing out :o

sony is about to sweet talk them fanboy panties right off and not going to call after

[QUOTE="deeliman"][QUOTE="RedentSC"] Any post you make is automatically invalid .. just sayingCallOfDutyRulez

- Insiders confirm 5 billion transistor is for GPU ONLY.

2x AMD 7970 = 5 billion transistor.

>768 ALU for the GPU

Nvidia GTX 680 = 1536 ALU
AMD 7970 = 2048 ALU
Nvidia's architecture is more efficient, so its 1536 ALU can beat 7970's 2048 ALU

So to beat titan with 2880 ALU, AMD must provide a GCN 1.0 performance of 3840 ALU or 1.3 times of ALU number for titan.

Since Nvidia Titan has 2880 ALU, the ONE's AMD GPU must be at least 3840 ALU on GCN 1.0.

AMD recently created GCN 2.0 GPU with 2880 ALU and claimed it would work more efficiently than NVIDIA's titan.

More specifically, GCN 2.0 will have 30-40% better efficient design, meaning that with GCN 2.0, the ONE's GPU would only need 2880 ALU.

[QUOTE="Tighaman"]

[QUOTE="CallOfDutyRulez"]

Making up more bullshit? :lol:

DF confirmed The Division was running on the PS4. :cool:

And post some proof that the PS4 devkit has a DDr3 RAM for the CPU.

CallOfDutyRulez

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-tech-analysis-tom-clancys-the-division

"The Division's frame-rate is a solid 30fps based on what's shown so far, with only hints of dips to 28fps during grenade explosions."

And if you're talking about 10 FPS, maybe you should look at the ONE's DR3 that has last-gen graphics and runs at 10 FPS.

There is no mention of DDR3 for the CPU for the PS4 devkit... You're just making sh*t up, like always.

[QUOTE="Tighaman"]

what open world game infamous? Popins everywhere even in the cut scene at this moment. Ass. Creed? Running on the PC thats sitting on the far left side behind the curtains at E3? and that was a dev kit, but what you dont understand is that the PS4 dev kit had DDR3 inside for the cpu and GDDR5 for the GPU its not going to convert over well with an all GDDR5 console. I think i made plenty of sense by the way.

xboxiphoneps3

[QUOTE="tormentos"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

X1's cooling solution i.e. rivals blu-ray drive' size.

wouldn't the Xbox one be closer to a 7790HD except lower clockspeed?

Cooling solution for Radeon HD 7850 (~130 watts TDP)

For Crysis 2 DX11, X1's GPU would be closer to W5000 and than to 7770 i.e. due to improved "2 primitives" per cycle rate, higher register storage (scale with CU), higher L1 cache (scale with CU), greater LDS (scale with CU), greater L2 cache (scale with memory controlers) and higher effective memory bandwidth (DDR3 68 GB/s + 32 MB ESRAM 192 GB/s + JIT LZ compression/decompression).

7770 only has 72 GB/s memory bandwidth.

ronvalencia

See this is why i make su much fun of you..

LINKs to were it say that teh card you just posted there is a 5 billion APU with and 8 core CPU and an 1.6 billion transistor ESRAM..

Not it will not that is what you want to assume the W5000S is not 1.13 TF is 1.3 TF and has higher than 800mhz clock to.

I want a link to where it say that the 7850 has a big apu like the xbox one,so that you totaly wrong comparison even start to make sense.

There's only a minor effecive difference between between 800 Mhz to 850Mhz (the required Mhz for 1.3 TFLOPS). You're talking about 1 to 2 FPS.

The difference between 800 Mhz to 850 Mhz is even smaller than the difference with X1 and PS4.

My 12 CU's 31 FPS estimate is lower than W5000's 33 FPS.

------------

"The power consumption of SRAM varies widely depending on how frequently it is accessed; it can be as power-hungry as dynamic RAM, when used at high frequencies".