Tighaman's forum posts

Avatar image for Tighaman
Tighaman

1038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Tighaman
Member since 2006 • 1038 Posts

@misterpmedia: what else you gonna use? I say that was just some nice word play from Cerny he knows that one DSP core is not going cut it with ingame audio,chat ,camera and sound through controller.

Avatar image for Tighaman
Tighaman

1038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Tighaman
Member since 2006 • 1038 Posts

@darkangel115: Its seem like they just didnt even listen to Cerny trying find the next bad news about the x1

Avatar image for Tighaman
Tighaman

1038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Tighaman
Member since 2006 • 1038 Posts

@misterpmedia: the same interview about the rumors 14+4 cu use read it

Avatar image for Tighaman
Tighaman

1038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Tighaman
Member since 2006 • 1038 Posts

@misterpmedia: true audio TECHNOLOGY it got one DSP is not enough for all sound for the game and crosschat and etc dont say i dont know what im talking about. Cerny already said you will need help for the gpu for ingame sound that ONE DSP is not enough when the competition has a whole sound block with 4 DSP cores for sound try again.

Avatar image for Tighaman
Tighaman

1038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Tighaman
Member since 2006 • 1038 Posts

@misterpmedia: thats yall problem everytime someone hit you fanboyswith some knowlegde instead of you listening you go into the misterx excuse when all you got to do is go back to the arch panel from march of last year and hotchips and you could find out yourself the only thing that ps4 go going for it is a .5 more tfs and if you have to uses cpu offloading to the gpu, sound with gpu, and CUs for gpgpu that .5 disappear fast because the x1 has different processors for them tasks.

Avatar image for Tighaman
Tighaman

1038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Tighaman
Member since 2006 • 1038 Posts

im telling you everything i said about that it came from the people who designed both consoles i dont need to copy or paste anything since you just read the FUD about the x1 maybe you need to read more and try to understand the positives as well as the negatives about the console.

Avatar image for Tighaman
Tighaman

1038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Tighaman
Member since 2006 • 1038 Posts

@misterpmedia: i know how you think how their using gpgpu the extra four CUs Cerny said is used for cpu offloading or gpgpu and look a the hotchip diagram 2 extra compute processors and 2 extra graphic compute processors. x1 dont use any the 12 CUs for gpgpu.

Avatar image for Tighaman
Tighaman

1038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Tighaman
Member since 2006 • 1038 Posts

@DerekLoffin: thats all hyperbol against windows about efficient programming and thats crazy to say about someone whos been a leader in their field for 20+ years

Avatar image for Tighaman
Tighaman

1038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Tighaman
Member since 2006 • 1038 Posts

@misterpmedia:

no its not the same method just because they chips was fabbed the company doesnt mean its the same arch or processing of utilizing gpgpu sony uses cu for gpgpu x1 has 4 extra processors for gpgpu

Avatar image for Tighaman
Tighaman

1038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Tighaman
Member since 2006 • 1038 Posts

@DerekLoffin: well i guess we can put sony in that same boat, emotion engine? The cell? MS software expertise balances out cpu and gpu coding HELLO direct x, c++AMP ,windows