Halo isn't even all that great... just your average overhyped FPS and nothing more. The same things have been done before and better.

Although this is old this reviwer said it best:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/editorials/zeropunctuation/2304-Zero-Punctuation-Halo-3

It is right now!

It is right now!

It is right now!

Yup

[QUOTE="Cedmln"]A lot of blind people will disagree with this.white45e

this reveiw was crap and shouldnt be takin seriously

his main complaints were this

1. i hate multiplayer so thus i didnt even try multi and so halo 3 has crap multi

2. the story didnt make sense even though i didnt play 1 or 2 in a trilogy

3. the singleplayer is ok but not the best and i base my reveiw on this cause i hate all things multiplayer..

this guy is a freaking joke

The guy above you was correct only BLIND PEOPLE...

1). For a game to be perfect it shouldn't need anything to excuse it. Thus, Halo 3 is flawed.

2). He did he research on the subject matter of the game. Halo's story is just unintelligible. I've played all three and agree with that.

3). The single player is lackluster and everything done in Halo 3 has been done elsewhere and better. He doesn't hate the multiplayer he merely states that a supposedly perfect game shouldn't need anything to excuse it. Stop hearing things that aren't there.

[QUOTE="Nogard229"]he says he liked bioshock in there, but he made fun of it before alot when it came he out it just likes do that.Exile91

In the beginning of the Bioshock review he says that it's really good. The whole reason people watch his "show" is because he critisizes games, not praise them.

Edit: That's not to say that all he does is critisize games. He does give some praise for certain games (See Psychonauts).

He also praised the portal portion of the Orange Box. He actually doesn't say anythingh bad about it at all.

major oldness.conman12345

Its age in no way affects its credibility.