[QUOTE="pintabear49blue"][QUOTE="Eastwick_playa7"][QUOTE="Juggernaut140"][QUOTE="Eastwick_playa7"][QUOTE="pintabear49blue"][QUOTE="Eastwick_playa7"][QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

Why is being a toy bad? My car is a toy, my sound system is a toy, now that I think about it almost everything that I own that I don't wear, eat or live in is a toy.

So I have to say you are correct, when I owned a Wii it didn't bring me any pleasure at all so yeah, it's mos def not a toy.

Eastwick_playa7

You are to..

Are you not aware that the 360 has the most AAA's?

So lets go by GR for this argument . The wii has three AAA titles. The 360 has 10 more then that.

That's because it's the truth the Wii is vastly inferior.

No the Wii is the definition of a 'toy'. I can't get why sheep don't see that. Nintendo is no different than any other businiess. They only want to make money. None on them care about 'the future of gaming'. That's why the Wii is so cost effective. That's the only reason why they made it that way. I say that Nintendo cares even less that Sony or Microsoft. Because clearly they are sacrificing more for the industry. The Wii is nothing but a gimmick/toy used to revive Nintendo's dying console division. Sony and Microsoft have the only TRUE consoles on the market today.

By the way a collection of games from a franchise that should be dead isn't what TRUE gamers want.

like the Ninja Gaiden dude said...he is working on the most powerful console on the market....becuz he is able to get the most out of it....what good is the PS3 so called power if it remains untappedchikenfriedrice

And he did a game for the PS3 first.

/thread

By golly, it's almost here.....Halo 3 is almost upon us......turaaggeli

And it's going to suck in comparison to Bioshock, Killzone 2, Haze, COD4, and a number of other great shooters that're coming out. Face it, HALO IS LAME!

Here's the FACTS for foolish fanboys. Not only is the Cell the best around. The PS3's hardware overall unrinates on the competition.

The cell is clocked at 3.2GHz and has 9 cores (one control processor and 8 SPEs). You cant compair GHz to GHZ, because the processors are two completely different designs. In that case the PS3 and 360 would be the same. It just doesn't work like that. First of all, the cell uses pure vector processors which are alot more efficient than the 360s general purpose G5 derivatives, so they can do more at a lower clock. Secondly, there are 8 of them(2 reserved). Each SPE has its own dedicated pool of memory instead of cache. there is NO system memory. Which means that there is also no lag time between the processor and memory, speeding up the whole system. Using dedicated RAM instead of cache also helps to make the processor run closer to its 'paper' speeds by getting rid of innefficiencies inherent in cache. 4th it has INSANE system bandwidth. This means that it can interact with the other parts with less lag time and more information can be transmitted between them. 5th, as a vector processor it can also render graphics. meaning it can help the gpu do its job if it has some free time. 6th, blueray can hold more data and transfer that data faster than dvd and hd dvd. they are also researching multi layer discs that currently hold 100GB. In other words the PS3 PWNs all.

All i keep seeing is this BOGUS analogy for yhe Sony fans that oh no MS is loosing bigtime onthe 360. AH NO? even with the extend warranty for 3 years now. MS was making about 75$ per console for almost a year now. Now yes that has been wyped away because of the 3 year warranty extension issues.

But tell me you guys realize that Sony is so farin the RED with PS3 they are loosing well over $100 per system. And with sales in the TOILET. Sony does not look to turn a profit to around year 5 at this point on PS3. It was hoped by into year 4 Sony would turn a profit. But it seems with Sale far lower then Sony expectations we could be looking at year 5 at this point.

So basically MS is back at even with the 360 now and hope to go back in the green in about a year.

Now here is the BIG KICKER. Sony and MS look to make there real money from software. Well if you guys have any clue MS is CLEANING HOUSE in this dept. They are wiping the floor with both Nintendo and Sony in this. The game attachment rate for PS3 is WORST then PATHETIC and yes in a very distant lst place in this regard.

So lets clear this up here guys. Sony is in WAY worst shape then MS.

The_Trash_Man07

No actually, they're not. Sony is making a profit now. Blu-Ray doesn't cost anything in the PS3. That's because the Cell processor decodes the Blu-Ray stream and the diodes aren't that expensive. Sony was only losing money when the kept the EE in the PS3. Since that's been removed they've been making a profit on every PS3 sold.

[QUOTE="Nike_Air"]

Games - dunno

Sales - not 360

Burnout_Player0

games -ps3
sales - ps3

CORRECTED

PS3