I hear there is talk of Nintendo being stupid for releasing a console with such a small storage. I think that is super inconvenient, but lets think of the most expensive console, that is supposed to be central hub for all kinds of digital media and television recording is coming soon. I find it crap to download games for couple of minutes again and again. But what I find ridiculously hard burden, is a monstrously expensive machine having to install games for half an hour a piece, because they thought rather unwisely to put BlueRay alongside such a small harddrive in it. Games are collecting dust because you just can't erase a game that is currently played.
If there is not some problem with SD-card reading times, I'd say SD would be ideal. Their cheap. Everyone already have them, so developers wouldn't have to worry about how many people could buy their games. Plus there is no reason to make bigger downloadable games than lets say one Gigabyte.
pc costs >>>>>>> every console combined. Mere graphics card cost more than a PS3, not to mention it will be old news next year. Because of Nethack, I will continue to love my computer eternally though.
Man they made Rick look stupid :D The higher consoles graphics capabilities grow, the lower artist tastes seem to dilute! (this is not best example, but I still had to say that. That couldn't be said too often novadays.)
I was coming to ask the same question. Im thinking to abandon overexpensive PC as a game platform, and planning to buy a replacement for it. Of games that arrive to both consoles, which are better looking?
Log in to comment